Try to post some from Camilla's show tonight if you can. I hear she's gonna be on.
(13-05-2010 22:25 )dirk362 Wrote: [ -> ]For those that have been monitoring this thread you'll have seen some of my picture posts have either dissappeared or have had some pics removed from them.
I totally see where cellcast are coming from in asking for them to be removed, so I'm fine with it. I'll have to be more prudent with what I post (if anything) going forward to ensure they stay...
oh and there were some babes on the show last night, and indeed every night, that you'll have heard of. Some stuff has already been posted, but with so many repeats I clearly won't post those again. For others, the quality is just too poor to share or I recognise it's nothing you've not seen 100's of times on the normal channels.
I guess you're referring to the caps of Amanda? If so I have to disagree with your acceptance of their removal.
The Amanda bit was clearly beyond what Ofcom allow, which I assume is why they've been removed, but this is typical of all the adult pay channels. One or two occasions of stuff they're not supposed to show to draw the subscribers in, followed by huge piles of guff with the always ready excuse that "Ofcom limit what we can show".
So we have Amanda doing good work, pre-recorded. Cellcast knew what was going out. There will be more subscribers on the back of it. And now that they've had the desired effect they get removed.
They should either stick to the limits (in which case they'll not make much money), or they should actually have the guts to take a stand and broadcast what we all want. Ofcom's case will NEVER stand up in a court, otherwise we would not have hardcore magazines and DVDs in this country.
Don't believe the hype. Wait for at least a month of good stuff before you pay. And don't give in to their shabby attempts to drum up extra trade and then pretend nothing ever happened.
(14-05-2010 10:32 )Grawth Wrote: [ -> ]So we have Amanda doing good work, pre-recorded. Cellcast knew what was going out. There will be more subscribers on the back of it.
You can't subscribe to Babestation Xtreme.
(14-05-2010 10:36 )admiral decker Wrote: [ -> ] (14-05-2010 10:32 )Grawth Wrote: [ -> ]So we have Amanda doing good work, pre-recorded. Cellcast knew what was going out. There will be more subscribers on the back of it.
You can't subscribe to Babestation Xtreme.
OK, so pay per night. It's still payment viewing, which is the key point. They have a couple of occasions when things are good, then weeks of guff while people have paid PURELY BECAUSE OF REPORTS OF GOOD STUFF waste their money, and then the cycle repeats.
At worst, the channel gets a warning, but they make a large amount of money doing it. Even a fine is an acceptable risk given the money they make sucking in hopeful punters.
For previous examples how about Playboy with hardcore Sandy Babe Abroad night (lasted one night), or TVX and RedHot with Antonia Live Back Stage and Lolly's Live Peep Show (2 nights of toy action then nothing). Even if TVX only got 50 new subscribers from that fortnight, that would make enough money to cover a £10,000 fine.
The only channel that bucked the trend was SportXXX when for a period of weeks, possibly months, they showed toy action several times a week. Why it stopped I don't know.
So, the point I was trying to make is that showing a small amount of hard stuff, then banging out the excuses (and hiding the evidence) is standard adult PAY channel behaviour.
Oh, and technically, a subscription is a payment. Any payment. What you can't do is have a MONTHLY subscription to BSX.
Good points and very well made.
They are precisely why I didn't bother with it after launch night. Also, how many people paying this VIP price (what it says on the site) feel all that special once they've paid and tuned in!?
Just to fan the flames a bit more the Amanda vid was shown again last night, but a new edit - this showed none of the explicitness of the originally aired one. So it's been edited, and perhaps this is what should have gone out first time as well.
Channels do make mistakes where they have the same video in varying strengths. It's happened across most channels, so I think it unfair to call it a ploy on their part unless someone has information that confirms it.
If you have people in the process, you have to remember that people are fallible - mistakes can and will happen. Live with them, and move on, which is what cellcast seem to have done in this case by ensuring the mistake doesn't happen again.
(14-05-2010 13:25 )Grawth Wrote: [ -> ]Oh, and technically, a subscription is a payment.
Not according to Wikipedia where it distinguishes a subscription from a one time payment.
Not according to Webster's dictionary either, which states:
an arrangement for providing, receiving, or making use of something of a
continuing or periodic nature on a prepayment plan: such as a purchase by prepayment for a certain number of issues (as of a periodical)
(15-05-2010 09:41 )dirk362 Wrote: [ -> ]Just to fan the flames a bit more the Amanda vid was shown again last night, but a new edit - this showed none of the explicitness of the originally aired one. So it's been edited, and perhaps this is what should have gone out first time as well.
Channels do make mistakes where they have the same video in varying strengths. It's happened across most channels, so I think it unfair to call it a ploy on their part unless someone has information that confirms it.
If you have people in the process, you have to remember that people are fallible - mistakes can and will happen. Live with them, and move on, which is what cellcast seem to have done in this case by ensuring the mistake doesn't happen again.
you give them to much credit m8, it was deliberate cellcast dont make mistakes they have been in the business to long. it was so guys like you would post the pix on here and give them what amounts to word of mouth advertising.
chances are the vid was shown to boost flagging subs and cause a stir.
the fact they re-edited it is nothing new.
no doubt (hopfully soon to be defunct) ofcom would have a field day with the channel if it went a couple of days showing such content, but 1s in a blue moon means they can get away with it and gain subscribers (yes you are a subscriber even paying by night) yet minamise the chance of sum1 complaining to the watchdogs.
As Tiffany is currently on a break for a bit, the vid must be from some time ago. But this is the 1st time that video has been shown on BSXtreme (to my knowledge).
There have been a total of 3 vids of Tiffany so far, although I believe all are available on her website already...
Not according to Paypal either, as you can make a payment and then be asked if you want to subscribe to that service.