Why does`nt some one in authority,from Babestation just write to our forum [I know they read it] and explain to us why they have suddenly gone all softy softy with the encrypted channel even though they are advertising it as hardcore?
I am making a challenge now and I am hoping for a bona fida explanation,as in my opinion they are at this moment committing suicide by not explaining what is going on!
I think we all know perfectly well what the problem is. You only have to read certain other parts of this forum.
(28-12-2010 22:06 )nailpouchofmine Wrote: [ -> ]Why does`nt some one in authority,from Babestation just write to our forum [I know they read it] and explain to us why they have suddenly gone all softy softy with the encrypted channel even though they are advertising it as hardcore?
I am making a challenge now and I am hoping for a bona fida explanation,as in my opinion they are at this moment committing suicide by not explaining what is going on!
A great point but the simple fact is there are a sufficient number of people out there willing to pay for the watered sown version which is now showing. I've paid for extreme around 20 times - 99% of the time it's been live show days - most of them were good and much of their own produced films were good as well but the 'bought in' stuff was always poor and now the live shows have gone down to that level as well so I won't be paying again. I recorded them all so basically I've got all the content that was worth seeing.
against better judgment watched last night ,only because it was Reede, and saw less than half dozen pussy shots. £1 a shot. worth it? dont think so. pretty sure Camilla and Lolly's recording had been edited as well.
It does seem that they are being over cautious at the moment rather than merely cautious.
Thanks for the heads up guys.
if i hadn't have been busy doing something else i probably wouldn't have been able to resist purchasing this show cos i'm a reede fan and carmen is right up my street.
I really do want to believe in this channel as i've said before because the content in it's previous form was perfect for me.
However,
I'd still love to watch the girls on the phones like on the other babestation channels but nude and straight to camera.
With no touching of the genitals but lots of pussy on show and maybe just as a guess £3 a night i reckon it'd make good money.
Fuck all this talk of hardcore...we can all get bucketloads these days..i work with the stuff all day thats why i'm not really that interested in it.
It's these particular girls i wanna see
There must also be other ideas that can be explored..what about during shows other alternate cameras...on another channel...the option to watch camilla, leah and lolly's nude show with a couple of extra camera angles mixed in for £3 a night??
An actual more explicit version of babestation or babestation extreme??
Not sure she'd be up for it...but who wouldn't pay £3 for a nice view of tiffany from behind right now?? we know tiffany isn't adverse to showing her pussy anyway even if she doesn't want to do any form of sex even girl/girl so you could get more girls open to it.
Anyone else got any ideas of other ideas that can be explored to give us content we would want to see and that could be broadcast??
Cheers,
MrRude
(29-12-2010 02:24 )MrRude Wrote: [ -> ]what about during shows other alternate cameras...on another channel...the option to watch camilla, leah and lolly's nude show with a couple of extra camera angles mixed in for £3 a night??
An interesting idea, but I'm not sure that it would work too well in practice. Unless the girl was performing to the alternate cameras I'm not sure that people would be willing to pay just to watch, and she couldn't really do that and be facing the main camera at the same time. I don't think you'd get enough of an audience to make it work.
babestation extreme is crap.
(28-12-2010 22:26 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: [ -> ]I think we all know perfectly well what the problem is. You only have to read certain other parts of this forum.
If you knpw of material on the forum which is relevant, why not say what it is?
If you mean the Bang Babes saga, it's totally irrelevant. BB was free-to-air, BSXtreme is encrypted.
(30-12-2010 02:26 )vila Wrote: [ -> ] (28-12-2010 22:26 )Prince Henry Sinclair Wrote: [ -> ]I think we all know perfectly well what the problem is. You only have to read certain other parts of this forum.
If you knpw of material on the forum which is relevant, why not say what it is?
If you mean the Bang Babes saga, it's totally irrelevant. BB was free-to-air, BSXtreme is encrypted.
I think that Ofcon also warned Babestation that their "Extreme" channel was too explicit, hence they had to tone it down.
Ofcon have done this before with other subscription channels.