(14-02-2011 00:15 )fullbunger Wrote: [ -> ]I must say for that you guys protest about how rubbish BSX is, how it is such a waste you all seem to have a remarkable grasp on its intricacies, I mean analysis of transport packets, analysis of shots and angles, its not normal.
Come on guys, you're making trainspotting look like a thrill a minute.
It ain't porn, it ain't ever gonner be porn, the girls are great to look at, but you know what you ain't gonner see before you pay for it, so why are you still paying for it, much less getting upset about it, unless of course you have found a way to get BSX for free ?????
Yes, in the autumn it was great, but hey did you really think it was ever going to last once the regulators started looking at it.
Jeez, give it a rest for a while, don't watch, and then they will have only two choices, make it worth watching or stop broadcasting.
Well the last time I watched it was 12th december - Karina and rio, I think. Unless I'm very much mistaken most of the recent posts in this thread have been pointing out to potential viewers that it isn't what it was and not to waste their money ie similar to the last sentence in your post.
PS according to you we are supposedly obsessed but you have posted in no other threads?
I still think they are being over cautious at the moment and could go further than they are currently doing, but since Bang Babes lost their licences you can well understand why they are erring on the cautious side.
(14-02-2011 00:15 )fullbunger Wrote: [ -> ]I must say for that you guys protest about how rubbish BSX is, how it is such a waste you all seem to have a remarkable grasp on its intricacies, I mean analysis of transport packets, analysis of shots and angles, its not normal.
Come on guys, you're making trainspotting look like a thrill a minute.
It ain't porn, it ain't ever gonner be porn, the girls are great to look at, but you know what you ain't gonner see before you pay for it, so why are you still paying for it, much less getting upset about it, unless of course you have found a way to get BSX for free ?????
Yes, in the autumn it was great, but hey did you really think it was ever going to last once the regulators started looking at it.
Jeez, give it a rest for a while, don't watch, and then they will have only two choices, make it worth watching or stop broadcasting.
It`s advertised as porn though!!!
Well I thought where we'd posted details on content, type of shows, editing etc - these were all to share an understanding with others not watching what they can expect.
Given your view that we appear to have turned UK soft porn into a nerdy anorak past time, we can of course easily stop posting anything of interest and let others shell out the £5 a night to find out for themselves exactly what content is there, what quality etc.
I was brought up that if you can't say anything constructive, then don't say anything at all. Look for the positive or at least the positive intent of what was posted and don't leap into what are basically personally attacks.
In respect of their caution, this is a business they're running and so they have to be on the right side of things to keep their license. I agree with aaron that it's likely, as the other adult channels have done in the past, is revert back to a tamer output then slowly increase content strength over a long-ish period which allows this to become the norm. This way, whilst it takes longer perhaps than we'd care for, we will get to see stronger content. If you look back over the years and compare TVX, Redhot, Playboy and Adult Channel output today to say even just a few years back, it's night and day difference (accepting their brief journey into R18 material randomly after midnight about 3 years back before that got very quickly squashed)
(13-02-2011 01:11 )nailpouchofmine Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2011 23:39 )m100 Wrote: [ -> ]Whoever is answering as 'babestation' at the moment won't reply, last time they did they claimed they still were and always had been live shows, broadcast as they happened. They used to be live but whatever they say the shows are now recorded and edited to avoid shots of penetration and, babestation - if you do drag yourself to this thread, any other claim is total bollocks.
Yes it is quite obvious that they are recorded,if you were to look closely you might see that the shots jump from one camera to another and sometimes the babes on screen are in a different position etc.
The fact that the BABESTATION character doesn`t show his stuff very often suggests that he is another RCTV who claims to be something he/she is not.
You can think what you want, but you have my 100% guarantee that the the live shows we put out on a Friday and Saturday nights, the ones in two parts at 00:05 and 01:05, are completely and totally live. I've seen it for myself.
Camera shots change because there is live editing where the producer will switch between cameras as they're broadcasting it. If you're seeing girls suddenly in different positions, then I'm afraid it's just your imagination, or a misinterpretation when viewing from another angle.
I don't know if these opinions start because there is a misunderstanding about what shows are live and what aren't.... but just to clarify, we only ever put out live shows on Friday night and Saturday night. (other than one or two over xmas on a weds/thurs). If you're watching a performance in the week, it will be a repeat of a live show that has been recorded on a previous weekend, and these shows aren't advertised as fully live. We also have shows we advertise as pre-live shows, where we get the girls to record a quick mini-scene before they actually go live on television. These are used as features most nights and are obviously pre-recorded.
No ones trying to give you any misinformation here, it would be much easier for us to pre-record our live shows to guarantee a safe content level, but I'm afraid that's just not the case. Shows advertised as live on Friday and Saturday nights are 100% live.
(14-02-2011 16:21 )babestation Wrote: [ -> ] (13-02-2011 01:11 )nailpouchofmine Wrote: [ -> ] (12-02-2011 23:39 )m100 Wrote: [ -> ]Whoever is answering as 'babestation' at the moment won't reply, last time they did they claimed they still were and always had been live shows, broadcast as they happened. They used to be live but whatever they say the shows are now recorded and edited to avoid shots of penetration and, babestation - if you do drag yourself to this thread, any other claim is total bollocks.
Yes it is quite obvious that they are recorded,if you were to look closely you might see that the shots jump from one camera to another and sometimes the babes on screen are in a different position etc.
The fact that the BABESTATION character doesn`t show his stuff very often suggests that he is another RCTV who claims to be something he/she is not.
You can think what you want, but you have my 100% guarantee that the the live shows we put out on a Friday and Saturday nights, the ones in two parts at 00:05 and 01:05, are completely and totally live. I've seen it for myself.
Camera shots change because there is live editing where the producer will switch between cameras as they're broadcasting it. If you're seeing girls suddenly in different positions, then I'm afraid it's just your imagination, or a misinterpretation when viewing from another angle.
I don't know if these opinions start because there is a misunderstanding about what shows are live and what aren't.... but just to clarify, we only ever put out live shows on Friday night and Saturday night. (other than one or two over xmas on a weds/thurs). If you're watching a performance in the week, it will be a repeat of a live show that has been recorded on a previous weekend, and these shows aren't advertised as fully live. We also have shows we advertise as pre-live shows, where we get the girls to record a quick mini-scene before they actually go live on television. These are used as features most nights and are obviously pre-recorded.
No ones trying to give you any misinformation here, it would be much easier for us to pre-record our live shows to guarantee a safe content level, but I'm afraid that's just not the case. Shows advertised as live on Friday and Saturday nights are 100% live.
So you have finaly surfaced again
I could swear that you said you did not watch the shows,so you actually are a liar or you really are not who you say you are.
I for one am totally convinced these shows are not live,
To prove it would be quite easy just by putting a tv screen in the background with babestation switched on,that way everyone that pays to watch this `live?` programme, could compare the images to what is happening on babestation,easy
(14-02-2011 16:58 )nailpouchofmine Wrote: [ -> ]I for one am totally convinced these shows are not live,
What makes you think that the shows are not live?
(14-02-2011 16:58 )nailpouchofmine Wrote: [ -> ]So you have finaly surfaced again
I could swear that you said you did not watch the shows,so you actually are a liar or you really are not who you say you are.
I for one am totally convinced these shows are not live,
To prove it would be quite easy just by putting a tv screen in the background with babestation switched on,that way everyone that pays to watch this `live?` programme, could compare the images to what is happening on babestation,easy
there are a number of us who post on this account. We don't watch the shows, but as we work in the building, we see the shows being recorded, whether live or pre-recorded. The shows which are promoted as 'live shows' are live, if you don't believe it, don't watch them.. it's as simple as that.
(14-02-2011 17:43 )babestation Wrote: [ -> ]there are a number of us who post on this account. We don't watch the shows, but as we work in the building, we see the shows being recorded, whether live or pre-recorded. The shows which are promoted as 'live shows' are live, if you don't believe it, don't watch them.. it's as simple as that.
What
you mean pay £5.00 to watch ,to find out that it is not actually live and then if you don`t like it don`t watch. Fucking great marketing idea if you ask me. Ofcom made one of its many rules on live tv a long time ago,and that was that any `live show` would have to have a delay ,so that in the event of a slip [penetraion for example] it could be quickly edited out [so veiwers were not shocked to their very souls,presumably] So you are saying[whoever you are] is that you do not abide by the Ofcom rules and the shows you put out are in fact `live and to the second` Be extra careful how you reply to this one,because RCTV may be reading it
(14-02-2011 18:15 )nailpouchofmine Wrote: [ -> ]What you mean pay £5.00 to watch ,to find out that it is not actually live and then if you don`t like it don`t watch.
Fucking great marketing idea if you ask me.
Ofcom made one of its many rules on live tv a long time ago,and that was that any `live show` would have to have a delay ,so that in the event of a slip [penetraion for example] it could be quickly edited out [so veiwers were not shocked to their very souls,presumably]
So you are saying[whoever you are] is that you do not abide by the Ofcom rules and the shows you put out are in fact `live and to the second`
Be extra careful how you reply to this one,because RCTV may be reading it
Noone asked you to pay another £5 and then not to watch, I just assumed as you are so sure that our shows aren't live, you wouldn't be watching again and therefore not paying £5 again.
So hang on, now your issue is that the show might be delayed by a few seconds and therefore isn't live? You've changed your tune quickly.
Our shows are live, if you believe that, great we hope you continue to enjoy it. If you refuse to believe it, don't pay the £5 to watch them again.. it's simple