The UK Babe Channels Forum

(07-03-2010 19:19 )Wazo Wrote: [ -> ]She has Moved to the TVX channels Vila

http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.php?tid=17789

Thanks Wazo - just discovered that. Should have done a search before rushing off my post!

(07-03-2010 05:39 )vila Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-03-2010 13:25 )TheWatcher Wrote: [ -> ]

(06-03-2010 12:52 )Scotsman Wrote: [ -> ]If it happened, people would want to see the likes of Dionne, Ella, Paige, Daryl, Tiffany etc., the regular BS babes doing it, but it'd end up being just Michelle Moist, Amber Leigh and the webcam girls I'd imagine. Which would be fine, but it wouldn't live up to what people would really want.

The current Babestation girls who would have no problems with doing it are
Lolly Badcock, Michelle Moist, Karina Currie, Jada, Sydney JJ, Cate Harrington and Ree Petra.
All of these have done porn and/or the sexstation webshow.
Presumably, there would also be the girls of the sexstation webshow as well.
At least 16 girls in total would be available.

You can add Dani O'Neal, Sammy-Jayne, Linsey Dawn McKenzie and Morgan to that list and there's a video flitting about somewhere of Tiffany getting very explicit on 3G.

With "Admin" stating that the show will not be a live interactive phone sex chat show but will be the same content as Playboy and TVX it is irrelevant as to which girls would do a nude sex chat show as it will not be one

(05-03-2010 18:35 )Winston Wolfe Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-03-2010 20:23 )Browser1 Wrote: [ -> ]I will finish up with one question for Winston Wolfe - will we have to pay to watch this new initiative?

The good thing is my plans won't interfere with the current free-to-air format... So if you like the current format, then no worries. However, that does mean the new format is very likely to be a pay-per-view/subscription channel. It will be a totally different thing, so comparisons with the current format would be pointless...

Bear in mind that there is no concrete deal in place with any channel and negotiations are very much open, which isn't straightforward in most industries let alone this one!

There is an ideal scenario, but I won't say just yet...

Thanks for the reply. If I'm reading this post and all subsequent posts correctly, it seems that the facts are as follows:

1. The new initiative may very well be an subscription/PPV job;
2. Because the viewers will be paying a subscription, there will be no revenue derived from the phone calls;
3. The actual format of the show is yet to be decided.

I know its a bit early to be commenting on it - seeing as the initiative is only at the planning stage - but it sounds to me that what we're looking at here is an atypical subscription channel. The only difference between this and what's gone before is that there will potentially be no pre-recorded stuff.

If this is the case then unfortunately, I don't think I'll be subscribing, seeing as I can get much much harder stuff online for almost nothing.

But, I am open to being pleasantly surprised. I will certainly keep an eye on these developments over the next few months.

Babestation already have the babes to start an encrypted channel.

They could use some of the Sexstation on line girls for the channel (Jess, or Hannah Shaw) 'or they could just stop streaming the on line channel.
I don't think that it has made much money as the quality of the streaming has not yet been perfected.

So my money (or not) is on closing down the streaming channel and using a more viewer friendly show on Sky.

(08-03-2010 18:43 )Browser1 Wrote: [ -> ]If this is the case then unfortunately, I don't think I'll be subscribing,

If you don't want to watch Babestation girls the channel would be pointless to you anyway, wouldn't it?

(08-03-2010 20:18 )Charlemagne Wrote: [ -> ]So my money (or not) is on closing down the streaming channel and using a more viewer friendly show on Sky.

I sincerely doubt that.

(08-03-2010 21:49 )aaron Wrote: [ -> ]

(08-03-2010 18:43 )Browser1 Wrote: [ -> ]If this is the case then unfortunately, I don't think I'll be subscribing,

If you don't want to watch Babestation girls the channel would be pointless to you anyway, wouldn't it?

Yes. I know that I've made reference in previous posts to not being a big fan of Babestation, but the performances on the channel over th last few months have been slowly causing a change of heart.

And I would certainly miss having the opportunity to be able to switch on and watch the new Babestation, and turn it off if I didn't like it. But for me to justify having a subscription to any channel, I would have to be watching it every night, and there have been a number of ocassions where I haven't watched Babestation at all.

(09-03-2010 21:14 )Browser1 Wrote: [ -> ]But for me to justify having a subscription to any channel, I would have to be watching it every night

In order to be watching it every night you'd have to pay for it every night.

So pay-per-night it is then. I guess we'll just have to wait and see what they're going to charge us to watch this 'new' show.

I suppose it will cost less than a lengthy call to one of the babestation girls.