As you would expect, any new channel will be fully compliant with the existing broadcasting code.
The mode of payment has already been raised and commented on in this thread.
It hasn't been stated here that any new channel would be on satellite rather than freeview.
I get really confused sometimes.I was watching by accident the Spice Extreme freeview which was rolling
Until 4.00am in th morning showing full frontal,actual language stating fucking,sucking and coming!and it was not encrypted
Why are these channels then subjected to such tight restrictions.The very least they should be able to do is say what they want on the
Open mic.
It's been done before, as we all know, and those channels haven't really lasted the distance so I'm guessing there's no market there. From what I remember the girls still had to cover up any penetration or 'contact' with certain parts of their body.
Also I agree with the glamour girls Vs porn girls. Unfortunately the girls who are known as porn girls aren't as glamourous or feminine as those who are either strictly day time girls or nights. While there may be a few exceptions (Rio Lee?), on the whole I prefer girly girls, especially the new one on Elite Tv.
Do a photogirls.net channel...would be like QVC...but far more interesting
didnt other channels try this? tvx callgirls used to encrypt after a certain time and they would get up to slightly more, with pussy to cam shots but anything more had to be either implied or the girls would turn to face the cam while inserting dildo's and the likes... im pretty sure after a few months this format died on its ass and now tvx callgirls is unencrypted, 1 the tamest and 1 of the cheapest to call.
there are 2 problems i see is as said b4 1 is getting us to pay twice for what is a slightly harder show, 1s to get the channel unencrypted and then to call the girls.
and the second is that because the show can only be slightly harder they would have to tame down there main channels as to make the pay channel more attractive... i know this is just speculation but go with it.
so the end result is guys stop calling the tame shows and the pay channel doesn't get the audience because people don't wanna pay for a service that promises a lot but delivers little. (what you don't think we don't know that the channels deliberately don't push for r18 material because they can get away with giving out less and use the law as an excuse to do so) its like in the the 90's when distributers would advertise r18 videos/dvd's for sale in the sport and the like knowing full well by law they couldn't/cant send r18 material via the postal system and the guys buying them got deliberately ripped off.
i guess these channels thinks we are all mugs for this shite and will swallow anything. well sorry to say if you look at the epg a lot of pay per view channels have gone recently. why? because they promised more than they could deliver. end result no subscribers.
the reality is if you want to go ahead with this kind of idea your gonna have to butt heads with ofcom, by giving the full uncensored version of a show that the channels have never supplied. if you cant do that or are incapable of doing it then forget it. it will be doomed b4 it even starts.
If it happened, people would want to see the likes of Dionne, Ella, Paige, Daryl, Tiffany etc., the regular BS babes doing it, but it'd end up being just Michelle Moist, Amber Leigh and the webcam girls I'd imagine. Which would be fine, but it wouldn't live up to what people would really want.
(06-03-2010 12:52 )Scotsman Wrote: [ -> ]If it happened, people would want to see the likes of Dionne, Ella, Paige, Daryl, Tiffany etc., the regular BS babes doing it, but it'd end up being just Michelle Moist, Amber Leigh and the webcam girls I'd imagine. Which would be fine, but it wouldn't live up to what people would really want.
The current Babestation girls who would have no problems with doing it are
Lolly Badcock, Michelle Moist, Karina Currie, Jada, Sydney JJ, Cate Harrington and Ree Petra.
All of these have done porn and/or the sexstation webshow.
Presumably, there would also be the girls of the sexstation webshow as well.
At least 16 girls in total would be available.
(06-03-2010 13:25 )TheWatcher Wrote: [ -> ]The current Babestation girls who would have no problems with doing it are
Lolly Badcock, Michelle Moist, Karina Currie, Jada, Sydney JJ, Cate Harrington and Ree Petra.
All of these have done porn and/or the sexstation webshow.
Presumably, there would also be the girls of the sexstation webshow as well.
At least 16 girls in total would be available.
Surely nothing to complain about there if it went ahead ...
(06-03-2010 09:04 )admin Wrote: [ -> ]As you would expect, any new channel will be fully compliant with the existing broadcasting code.
But what does that mean exactly? What can the girls 'do' behind encryption? Are we talking nude only? Let me explain - no one knows what Ofcom mean by "'adult sex' material". All I know is it ain't R18, so what the hell is it because Ofcom's 'adult sex' term doesn't appear anywhere in the BBFC rating guidelines. If Ofcom have invented some new 'standard' then it should be PRINTED somewhere so that the channels and, more importantly, the PAYING customers know what the fuck it is (or rather isn't) that they're paying for. Let me put it this way - 'adult sex' material means R18 to me but, as this is expressly verboten by Ofcom, then 'adult sex' appears to mean 'adult non-sex' material.
(This is a bit off-topic: But pray tell where in the Comms Act are Ofcom allowed to start creating new ratings/classifications for material and, indeed, start rating material on (or off) web sites they're simply not qualified (or legally entitled) to rate?)
Quote:The mode of payment has already been raised and commented on in this thread.
It's not leaping out at me. It is monthly or nightly? What will it cost (ballpark)? Will it involve callers and, if so, are calls from subscribers free, normal or premium rate? Will viewers be able to hear the calls (or at least the girls) for free or will they still pay to listen-in?
Quote:
It hasn't been stated here that any new channel would be on satellite rather than freeview.
Just typical.
(06-03-2010 13:25 )TheWatcher Wrote: [ -> ] (06-03-2010 12:52 )Scotsman Wrote: [ -> ]If it happened, people would want to see the likes of Dionne, Ella, Paige, Daryl, Tiffany etc., the regular BS babes doing it, but it'd end up being just Michelle Moist, Amber Leigh and the webcam girls I'd imagine. Which would be fine, but it wouldn't live up to what people would really want.
The current Babestation girls who would have no problems with doing it are
Lolly Badcock, Michelle Moist, Karina Currie, Jada, Sydney JJ, Cate Harrington and Ree Petra.
All of these have done porn and/or the sexstation webshow.
Presumably, there would also be the girls of the sexstation webshow as well.
At least 16 girls in total would be available.
You can add Dani O'Neal, Sammy-Jayne, Linsey Dawn McKenzie and Morgan to that list and there's a video flitting about somewhere of Tiffany getting very explicit on 3G.
IanG, if you ask someone who's been a subscriber to Playboy TV or TVX for example, they can no doubt describe for you the kind of material which is broadcast on these encrypted services.
You may assume for now that the charge will be nightly and that since the channel is deriving revenue in this way it will not be necessary to raise revenue by using telephone lines.