The UK Babe Channels Forum

^Well the few times I watched Xtreme (am relatively new to BS), it did exactly that - showed the actual babestation girls going further than they're allowed to on the channels ...

....i.e: girl on girl shows as explicit as you can get except penetration .... yeah the censorship was annoying to an extent but as they were filming literally a few inches away from the censored 'action' you didn't feel THAT cheated. But the oral etc./full nudity was all explicit, with nothing hidden and plenty of close-ups & the girls seemed v. involved and enjoying it.

They weren't all girl on girl scenes, some involved men, but in these scenes the censorship was for me more disruptive so didn't enjoy these as much.,

BS Girls I saw featured on various nights and paired up variously were:Angel Long, Ree Petra, Lolly, Dani, Camilla, Michelle and Candi.... possibly more I can't remember;

The 2 most memorable were Ree petra and Angel Long (with a sub/dom theme) & one involving Camilla & Lolly which really left nothing to the imagination at all (except insertion being censored) and was excellent.

to be honest I thought these shows were all v. good; I didn't watch some of the later stuff --have limited space on my FV box & didn't record everything, so can't vouch for the porn movies;
but the shows featuring the BS girls were well worth the money. Just IMO.

If poss, could we keep this sort of stuff in any general BSX discussion threads that exist? Hopefully this thread will just become a kind of daily schedule.

So, why do you still censor the shows?
What guidance have you had from Ofcon?

I do wish that the unecessary half screen bsxtreme osg would just dissapear.

Why does so-called 'Xtreme' refuse to show penetration, fellatio etc.? I thought they were licensed in the Netherlands? And if, for whatever reason, they still wish to abide by Ofcon censorship, why show non-penetrative masturbation and, to a lesser extent, cunnilingus, given that these constitute 'real sex', and would therefore receive an R18 from the BBFC, and hence be prohibited from broadcast by Ofcon?

Hey I watched BSX the other night and why is there killergram b/g scenes?? They are the most pointless scenes to show, because a) You cant show erect penises b) You cant show penetration c) You cant even show an erect penis near the girls fanny. So basically it was a top half view of some girl riding a guys dick but for all we know she could have been just bouncing on his trousers. Then the scenes last a long time with virtually no explicitness only tits??? Then have a cumshot which could well be milk based solution spraying on her face. However all your girl/girl and solo scenes are very hot and well worth watching because of the girls and the liveshows are good when you have naughty girls. At least the US b/g scenes are better because the camera angles are pro, I know you probably have a contract with Killergram but seriously their scenes are rubbish as soon as one appears I flick over to babestation 1/2 because I know that is a better show than 15mins of stripping (not even hot girls) and 15mins of tits bouncing over some guy.

So 2 lots of Killergram 15 certificate garbage and 1hr 45 mins of American soft core. Where exactly is the Babestation in this output? You have been on the go for almost 6 months and instead of increasing the amount of BS girls it seems to be dropping off. Now if you can get BS girls in the boy / girl scenes, and make them as explicit as the lesbian videos then you might get me back as a viewer. Otherwise I'll keep my fiver in my back pocket.

(24-10-2010 11:23 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]Why does so-called 'Xtreme' refuse to show penetration, fellatio etc.? I thought they were licensed in the Netherlands? And if, for whatever reason, they still wish to abide by Ofcon censorship, why show non-penetrative masturbation and, to a lesser extent, cunnilingus, given that these constitute 'real sex', and would therefore receive an R18 from the BBFC, and hence be prohibited from broadcast by Ofcon?

There is more than enough evidence to alledge that Ofcon collude with the broadcasters to allow a certain amount of explicitness.

Full on penetration and full on fellatio are the two great no-no's though.
I believe that if the output on TVX, Playboy et al were submitted to BBFC, then every night, at some point,it would receive an R18 cert for the broadcasts. A lot of it is dross, I concur, but it would still get R18 for certain scenes.

It's all a huge con!!

(26-10-2010 20:54 )blackjaques Wrote: [ -> ]

(24-10-2010 11:23 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]Why does so-called 'Xtreme' refuse to show penetration, fellatio etc.? I thought they were licensed in the Netherlands? And if, for whatever reason, they still wish to abide by Ofcon censorship, why show non-penetrative masturbation and, to a lesser extent, cunnilingus, given that these constitute 'real sex', and would therefore receive an R18 from the BBFC, and hence be prohibited from broadcast by Ofcon?

There is more than enough evidence to alledge that Ofcon collude with the broadcasters to allow a certain amount of explicitness.

Full on penetration and full on fellatio are the two great no-no's though.
I believe that if the output on TVX, Playboy et al were submitted to BBFC, then every night, at some point,it would receive an R18 cert for the broadcasts. A lot of it is dross, I concur, but it would still get R18 for certain scenes.

It's all a huge con!!

Indeed. But the con isn't solely restricted to the illegal ban on R18-type material. The 'reason' given to ban R18-type material is that some under eighteens can access and even purchase adult rated material.

Of course, the BBFC (in consultation with the public) have drawn-up a set of rating guidelines. Any material (e.g. horror, violence, sex, drugs etc.) that is deemed unsuitable for the under eighteens is given an 18 or R18 rating. The Comms Act says OFCOM are to protect the under eighteens - full stop. So, if OFCOM can't protect the under eighteens from R18-type material without banning it then, they cannot protect the under eighteens from ANY OTHER 18+ rated material without banning that also.

So, there's the REAL con. There's is no need, no necessity, no reason whatsoever to ban any other 18+ rated material despite the PUBLIC and BBFC doing their bit to protect under eighteens from exposure to drugs, violence, adult themes, explicit language etc. etc. etc..

And let's face it, the piss poor shite that gets passed off as 'adult sex material' isn't really suitable for 10 year-olds is it? No. So, if OFCON can claim to be protecting children from the 18+ rated 'OFCOMcore' 'adult sex material' with their mandatory PIN bollox (despite their so-called reaserch showing otherwise), there's no reason to prevent adults accessing real adult sex material rated R18 behind the same totally ineffective mandatory PIN.

The fact remains that 18+ rated material containing violence, bad language, sex scenes, adult themes, drug use, murder, rape and robbery etc. goes out unhindered after the 9pm watershed on virtually all FTA channels. Any under eighteen still watching after 10pm will undoubtedly be exposed to this type of adult-only material which, by public consultation with/by the BBFC, has been deemed totally unsuitable for under eighteens to see.

Now, what HARD EVIDENCE do OFCOM possess that PROVES this 18+ rated material is NOT a danger to children (which means the BBFC are redundant) and allow its transmission but, R18-type material is such a danger to BOTH adults and children that they can ban adults access to it? Without such HARD EVIDENCE, OFCOM are in breach of our Fundamental Human Rights and are thus a bunch of FUCKING CRIMINALS - and I've only been saying this for the past 6 years...

LOL at Dani and Michelle dressed as vampires advertising themself for bsxtreme, funniest thing I've seen all day. Apparently the theme they are going to put on bsxtreme is a halloween theme, so be scared and have bad dreams lol.