(23-02-2016 23:23 )tee Wrote: [ -> ]No matter how you hate McMahons will run things and to be honest I quite enjoy it. Vince is brilliant on mic no matter what you say. Stephanie, I can never get tired of seeing her. She is one hot McMahon. Shane has had some entertaining matches in the past. Linda was the boring one. She's not here. So chill. Remember wrestlemania in 2000 when whole McMahon family was behind the main event. Where stone cold screwed rock. That was an event I can never forget. Miss them days
Yeah i got to admit Steph is still pretty hot, she's probably hotter than all of the current divas except for Nikki, and Vince is a great heel even though he's really old now
Steph is still very pretty,I prefer the beautiful and talented Sasha Banks now though.
Vince is the best heel there ever has been. There was something corny when he was briefly face in the John Laurinatis era. It just didn't fit seeing him pander to the people - his very character should always be about being the villainous boss. It probably helps being the villain when he's madder than a box of frogs. Steph is still the hottest woman in wrestling for me.
So what's this Shane storyline all about then? Is the match against Undertaker at Wrestlemania the start of a summer-long program with the Authority vs a Shane O-Mac led consortium stable, kind of similar to what they did before with the takeover WWE vs WCW during the attitude era? I was just wondering if they have Shane lose to the Undertaker but then go on to defeat HHH at Summerslam, thus setting up a finale at Survivor Series with the ownership of the company at stake. Or is it just that they don't know what to do with the Undertaker at Wrestlemania, given that since his loss of the Streak to Lesnar his power has diminished somewhat and there aren't many big name guys he hasn't faced there?
To be honest I'd be happy to see Undertaker retire soon - he's already one of the best performers there's ever been and he doesn't have anything else left to achieve. They should never have ended the Streak, he should have retired undefeated at WM.
I think its time for Taker to retire permanently now,he's served the company well but with the streak at mania over I really don't see what else he can do.I'd hate to see him over stay his welcome like Flair,Hogan and so many others.With his injuries mounting and his age, he'd probably end up in the type of form he was in back in 2001 where he was voted worst wrestler of the year by Powerslam Magazine readers.Time to build some new stars now.
if sting was not injured maina32 would have been takers last mania has sting v taker is the fans fantasy match.
survivor series 5 man tag team match triple h with the league of nations v shane with 4 others.
Could see Shane goading taker into putting his retirement on the line in the match. On the other hand though I don't think taker will be keen on Shane being his last opponent
when taker retires they should do it at mania with him in the main event against someone like the rock, sting, angle, kane. give it good proper build up and a chance to say good either after the match or on raw afterwards. it is the right, decent and proper thing to do.
That's not a bad idea,I'd only like to see Taker face maybe Angle or Sting though,Kane is useless and the matches they had with Kane in his prime were boring and its been done too many times.The Rock has way to much muscle on him nowadays and looked clumsy and uncoordinated in has last few appearences when he actually wrestled.As banged up as Angle is,he can still work to a very high standard.
I know its old news,but Taker put the wrong guy over when the streak ended.
Angle would be the one, I remember in one of his past interviews he mentioned that taker wanted him to break the streak but the idea was shot down so it would be interesting plus can't remember the last time they faced off
I remember Angle saying that, I think he was bullshitting,but he had some crackers against the Undertaker in 2004.2005.