The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Top Gear
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Yeah Man causes massive row in hotel for 30 mins why wasnt plod called in the first place why did they wait till bbc investigation before imvestigating the Police are the law not the media
(26-03-2015 16:55 )cosmonaut Wrote: [ -> ]A cut lip is hardly GBH.

The deffinition of GHB is ""a wound is an injury that breaks the continuity of the skin""

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievous_bodily_harm

But whatever the legal point, were the incident so bad, Clarkson would have been arrested that night.

It all seems trumped up an excuse mongering to me.
(26-03-2015 19:09 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ]The deffinition of GHB is ""a wound is an injury that breaks the continuity of the skin""

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Grievous_bodily_harm


Try reading that page again.

Grievous bodily harm means "really serious bodily harm" is what it actually says.
(26-03-2015 19:18 )cosmonaut Wrote: [ -> ]Try reading that page again.

Grievous bodily harm means "really serious bodily harm" is what it actually says.

It says a lot of things, that being one of them, it also states:

''A single drop of blood is sufficient, but it must fall outside the body''

I was with you at one time when I first saw this on some documentary, I though GBH has was basically if you had hammered someone, but GBH CAN apply to the breaking of the skin with intent to cause an injury, much the same as if you merely place your hand on someone can be construed as assault; I know this because someone round our area was being spoken to by two police officers and he put his hand on her shoulder and was immediately arrested for it and charge with, I think, common assault.

The law is an idiotic thing that can be manipulated, however, to punch someone to actually draw blood is a very serious thing.

A part from anything else I'd imagine the producer would sue Clarkson. Makes me wonder if Clarkson had already made his mind up to go, or informed the BBC that he wasn't renewing his contract, it all seems a bit staged to me.

Did somebody on here say the producer went to casualty? for a cut lip from a scuffle? Seriously?
(26-03-2015 21:13 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ]Did somebody on here say the producer went to casualty? for a cut lip from a scuffle? Seriously?

Depends how bad the cut was. It might have required a couple of stitches.
(26-03-2015 21:13 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ]
(26-03-2015 19:18 )cosmonaut Wrote: [ -> ]Try reading that page again.

Grievous bodily harm means "really serious bodily harm" is what it actually says.

It says a lot of things, that being one of them, it also states:

''A single drop of blood is sufficient, but it must fall outside the body''

No, you're still reading it wrong.

You're quoting from the definition of wounding, NOT from the definition of grievous bodily harm.

Wounding and grievous bodily harm are 2 different things.
(26-03-2015 21:13 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ]Did somebody on here say the producer went to casualty? for a cut lip from a scuffle? Seriously?

No it was because he was feeling dizzy, according to media reports.
Jeremy Clarksons official Top Gear Farewell. Big Grin

just watching the F1 qualifying on BBC1 think if they are looking for 3 presenters should get Suzi perry David Coulthard and Eddie Jordan good chemistry between them and in coulthard a damm fine driver. the problem of the F1 season could be got round having challanges in the countrys they visit and there is also a mid season break and the off season
Dermot O'Leary has been suggested now as a replacement for Clarkson with the news that he is leaving x-factor and wont be back for next series
Reference URL's