The UK Babe Channels Forum

(03-02-2016 01:35 )CIA Snooper Wrote: [ -> ]No, those kind of rates are not unusual. Steep, but not unusual.

(03-02-2016 01:48 )wackawoo Wrote: [ -> ]

(03-02-2016 01:35 )CIA Snooper Wrote: [ -> ]No, those kind of rates are not unusual. Steep, but not unusual.

Think I'll put my toying with the idea of an escort on hold then.

(03-02-2016 01:59 )hairbald Wrote: [ -> ]He's right saying they are not unusual rates but they still remain a little delusional considering most of us had to look up who Lolly was. You can get a whole lot bigger names in the porn and glamour industry for £300 to £350 so don't give up hope yet. I give you:

(31-01-2016 22:53 )jestertk Wrote: [ -> ]Has anyone booked Michelle Thorne ?

I see on photogirls she is available on the 3rd. Noticed she was asking whether she should get her tits biggers

I reckon she likes sex a lot and needs the cash

(31-01-2016 23:06 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Interesting.

Seems like they are punishing men in general, which I think is the wrong way to go about it. Sex is natural, and as long as women aren't being forced into escorting (I know there are many who are in fact forced, which is disgusting and an obvious crime), then I believe people should be able to do as they please. Bringing criminal action against those who pay for sex, will only make those people find a new way to go about it. Sex for money is something that will likely never end, not in my lifetime at least. It's just how the world is.

It's a crazy thing money. It corrupts, yet it's essential for survival. It all comes down to money, because that's where the incentive is.

Black, white, and the often forgotten grey, but nobody likes or has the patience to think about grey...

(03-02-2016 17:56 )starwok55 Wrote: [ -> ]I hope the no posts about Michelle Thorne means there have been no takers. So happy she aint getting nowt. did I mention before she blew me out years ago and I aint got over it never will