(14-07-2012 16:23 )The Silent Majority Wrote: [ -> ] (14-07-2012 12:19 )cwpussylover Wrote: [ -> ]get your point Karina and respect your personal stance. but those girls you seek to protect should stack shelves or drive vans or wax or office work...if you dont want the risks DONT DO IT! NO way do I fel sorry for them, they want the cash...then cry wolf,theres millions of people in this country at the moment NEED extra cash, but they dont turn to crime or prostitution because they choose NOT to, or fear getting caught, so those girls that do and cry foul when caught out, are no different from a shoplifter who gets caught and nicked, everythings rosy whilst they dont get casught out.
I've no real interest in this thread but I clicked on it the other day, out of curiosity, because I noticed Karina was the last poster.
So, couple of 'questions from the audience', as it were.
You're likening escorting/prostitution (a legal activity) to shoplifting (a criminal activity) and both deserve everything they get when they're exposed. Is that correct?
And, how would you guys, who use escorts, feel if the girls came on here and posted your real names?
how much of the escorts earnings are declared??? then it is money laundering....a criminal offence. I had girls call/text without warning or being asked....to .when with bird/friends and dropping me in it..just so they c an buy a new handbag/shoes
I'm reminded of some years back, around the early days of the Sport newspaper. There were a number of page3 and glamour girls who would go to Germany or Holland and do shoots for the porn mags, and even hardcore movies. They did this safe in the knowledge that because of our censorship laws, this material wouldn't be sold in the UK, and their little secret wouldn't be found out by friends and family, or affect their glamour career. I seem to recall even a certain Goddess Sinclair tried to deny she had made some movies at one time.
Of course, when our censorship laws were relaxed, and even more so, when the internet took off, all those girls suddenly had their secret past exposed and had to fess up to their loved ones.
To the matter in hand, I'd say that if a girl is being advertised on websites, even if it's under a different name, or with face obscured in the pictures, she is fair game for discussion. If you don't want your secret revealed, go fully UTR, or simply don't do it! Book a few extra modelling sessions or a couple extra shifts on the channels to earn those extra dollars instead. If you are being advertised, and no doubt using your glamour/babechannel image as a selling point, you have to expect to be exposed somewhere. If we decide not to discuss it here, it will still be discussed somewhere else, and google will easily find it!
These girls have a free choice, they are in an industry where they put themselves in the public eye, if they then decide to do prostitution as well, they have to expect that it will become public knowledge, you make your choice you have to be prepared to live with the consequences.
Yes I agree with most of the comments. A lot of escorts who are presenters use this to charge excessive fees, which they are allowed to do. Escorts who are not TV presenters probably may give a much better service and charge a lot less. The presenters who do escort really have no gripe with the publicity. There are a small number of presenters who started their working life as escorts and did it for a few years before they became presenter/glamour models. Most of these girls still continue to work as escorts and really have nothing to complain about if someone draws attention to this.
I've read this whole thread with interest, thanks to all the posters, it's been top reading
There are a few I wouldn't mind trying out and some I've seen advertised. However, say for instance UTR girls, how would I manage to find out if certain tv babes done it? Is it just by chance of being a punter you may come across one, so to speak?
I don't want to bring names into it but if anyone could help me by PM I would love to know any tips.
Cheers and keep up the thread, top reading
(14-07-2012 18:19 )cwpussylover Wrote: [ -> ]how much of the escorts earnings are declared??? then it is money laundering....a criminal offence.
actually, a lot of them do declare their earnings
Many of you are so convinced that ofcom use this forum to check on 'slips' etc have you ever considered that you may just be doing the tabloids a favour by 'naming' UTR girls?
Also it seems strange that some of you want the girls to be up front and public about what they do but we are all hiding behind user names on here and some of you aren't even 'brave' enough to have the same username on different forums. And how many of you are up front and open about your porn stash?
Ever considered that some of the girls might have younger brothers or sisters or even their own children who they don't want stumbling upon their sideline courtesy of some online wankers?
If you were really honest most of you would admit you'd come if you were in the same postcode as some of these girls.
^ Interesting comment, and I agree with it, somewhat.
I think we've come to the conclusion that KNOWN escorts, as in escorts on free to view escort sites with their faces shown to all, are fair game when it comes to mentioning them here.
If women don't want to be talked about, then they should be UNDER THE RADAR and NOT for all to see on escort sites. If people here can't mention known escorts, then this section should be close, right?
If a girl has her pictures on an escorting site like Photogirls, Adultwork etc. then we're free to discuss her as long as we are respectful and dealing in facts. If someone has seen said girl, then great, they can share their opinions of the meeting. Explicit details is perhaps a bit much but I don't see why they can't say they saw her and had a great time or she wasn't worth it or whatever.
If a girl is supposedly 'under the radar' with no proof to substantiate it then she shouldn't be discussed here in my opinion. Speculation over girls shouldn't be allowed but I don't see the issue discussing known girls who advertise themselves across the internet. I think we've pretty much established this over the past few pages of this thread to be fair.
I think that UTR girls shouldn't be discussed openly on here but just to throw something out there. How do the 'UTR' girls get any business if nobody can discuss them therefore nobody knows they offer the service?
^^^^ as far as i can tell, regular, trusted, high paying customers would be offered this service at the girls discretion (word of mouth between the utr girls also) but how much you'd have to spend or how long you'd have to be using a particular company for i could not tell you.