The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Escorting
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576
looking to go and see someone but don't know whether to have 1h or 1h 30? any suggestions
People go to places like Dubai and Egypt because they are... top, exclusive holiday destinations.
(20-06-2012 20:29 )Merc with the Mouth Wrote: [ -> ]People go to places like Dubai and Egypt because they are... top, exclusive holiday destinations.
I wouldn't say Egypt is a top holiday destination these days
(20-06-2012 20:08 )munch1917 Wrote: [ -> ]How would this be any different from not mentioning when a 'slip' happens on screen, in order to protect the channels from Ofcom action?

You yourself have supported the idea of keeping quiet about slips that have happened. These are real genuine things that we know have definitely happened. Yet at the same time, you are quite happy to speculate about specific girls being escorts based on nothing more than geography!

Many of the girls live in London. There are escorts in London, so does that mean all those girls are escorts?
It's a nonsense argument.

I'd say if you know a girl escorts it's fine to mention it. If a girls name or photo appears on an escort site, even if it turns out to be a fake profile, as so many are, it's fine to mention it. But to name specific girls and imply they may escort simply because they are in the glamour industry and go to a certain destination, is highly disrespectful to that girl and shouldn't be done, and shouldn't be tolerated by this forum.

Then by that, the mods should delete the slip of the day thread immediately right? That's something that could get the channels fined, whereas wondering about who escorts and mentioning some who go to Dubai doesn't seem like such a horrible thing to talk about in an escorting thread, but I'll refrain from mentioning any non known escorts who travel there in this thread from now on to not cause a fuss. I do tend to become a bit jaded while on this forum at times, and the computer has an effect on me, where I don't always consider everything before posting.

I hope you will respond like this to any new speculative comments from other members in the future as well Wink
[attachment=34647]

Hi everyone,

My first post. Guess who I found on Adultwork. Who remembers Jessica from chat girls tv?

She is now: Sexyjenna40

http://www.adultwork.com/ViewProfile.asp...arch%2Easp

She offers escorts, webcam and phone chat. She is great!

PS. She is the blond one in the picture.
http://www.adultwork.com/JessieJ07 - This is Laura Hermansen profile. She has just set it up and is working on it and getting verified. She just emailed me the link.
(20-06-2012 20:43 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]
(20-06-2012 20:08 )munch1917 Wrote: [ -> ]How would this be any different from not mentioning when a 'slip' happens on screen, in order to protect the channels from Ofcom action?

You yourself have supported the idea of keeping quiet about slips that have happened. These are real genuine things that we know have definitely happened. Yet at the same time, you are quite happy to speculate about specific girls being escorts based on nothing more than geography!

Many of the girls live in London. There are escorts in London, so does that mean all those girls are escorts?
It's a nonsense argument.

I'd say if you know a girl escorts it's fine to mention it. If a girls name or photo appears on an escort site, even if it turns out to be a fake profile, as so many are, it's fine to mention it. But to name specific girls and imply they may escort simply because they are in the glamour industry and go to a certain destination, is highly disrespectful to that girl and shouldn't be done, and shouldn't be tolerated by this forum.

Then by that, the mods should delete the slip of the day thread immediately right? That's something that could get the channels fined, whereas wondering about who escorts and mentioning some who go to Dubai doesn't seem like such a horrible thing to talk about in an escorting thread, but I'll refrain from mentioning any non known escorts who travel there in this thread from now on to not cause a fuss. I do tend to become a bit jaded while on this forum at times, and the computer has an effect on me, where I don't always consider everything before posting.

I hope you will respond like this to any new speculative comments from other members in the future as well Wink

I'm going to have to agree with Mr Mann here, although I agree there's no need to "out" anyone. That said, I'll admit my reasons are selfish - I like the high end expensive type who are readily available in Dubai. However, don't just assume it's only British high end girls. On the contrary, many very high end girls "holiday" in Dubai from all over the world and are very well known models.

He and others are right about Dubai - I have a place there and see many girls there in clubs/hotels - they may be in Dubai, for a vacation but they're not exactly hiding away when in town. This is not speculation, just fact from observation. There's nothing wrong with comments like this on this forum as this is what this forum is about - helping other like minded guys (without naming utr girls).

As I said, I don't believe in "outing" but I do think it's fair game to mention Dubai in general on this forum. Similarly, I wouldn't want to make comments on individual girls, but they're not exactly shrinking violets out here. Sorry if I upset anybody for saying this, but Twitter chat is not exactly an unreliable source......

PS It's correct that many girls live in London - and the percentage of available utr girls (in my experience over many years) isn't too different from Dubai. Others have also commented that remarks like this are too general and you should only make them if you're prepared to name names. My simple response to this is to "pay up" and all will be revealed whether it be a yes or no. It's pretty obvious which agencies will help answer the question. Again, I say this purely for the benefit of those that may wish to do so - which is what I believe this forum is about.
Are we any closer to knowing if this is real or complete BS?

http://www.photogirls.net/charley.htm
(22-06-2012 21:42 )bergstrom Wrote: [ -> ]Are we any closer to knowing if this is real or complete BS?

http://www.photogirls.net/charley.htm

Not sure, but she says on her Twitter that she's setting up an Adultwork page, not found it yet though (maybe it isn't set up yet). Not that she'll definitely be escorting through there either, but you could message her on there or Twitter.
It's fair game to mention Dubai but it's not fair game to insinuate that every girl that goes there is only there for escorting. Throwing in specific names of girls who don't escort like Dannii Harwood and Ashley Emma isn't on, this thread should be for hard facts and not speculation or fantasy.

I have no problem with escorting, I've taken up the services of many girls over the past three or four years, but a lot of people do, many models included, and I'm sure there are those who would be deeply offended to have people running around the internet insinuating that they escort.
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 436 437 438 439 440 441 442 443 444 445 446 447 448 449 450 451 452 453 454 455 456 457 458 459 460 461 462 463 464 465 466 467 468 469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491 492 493 494 495 496 497 498 499 500 501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509 510 511 512 513 514 515 516 517 518 519 520 521 522 523 524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532 533 534 535 536 537 538 539 540 541 542 543 544 545 546 547 548 549 550 551 552 553 554 555 556 557 558 559 560 561 562 563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576
Reference URL's