It should also be noted that all of the Girls you just mentioned Jonathan state they do not escort in their adultwork profiles....just in case there is any confusion!!!
(03-06-2010 09:52 )astonv1 Wrote: [ -> ]It should also be noted that all of the Girls you just mentioned Jonathan state they do not escort in their adultwork profiles....just in case there is any confusion!!!
I understand that yet they are featured on an escort site? A bit of a con??? Then there is the £1500 for what
And you notice you have to pay to view the private images before she will reply to you
Just wondered it's some bloke making a bit of money from the girls pictures
Wanted to know what others thought or if they had used sugarbabes??? Or am I just being cynical again?
I think the 3rd one down is genuine - she said she was 'bobbi' (
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...#pid126108) when I messaged her on AW circa April'09 - never saw her in the end as was a one off thing for me and she wanted 200 for an hour and 2 mins later I found Leigh Logan for 150 an hour and way nearer to home, so went with her in the end for my sole 'dabble' with the escorting world in life so far.
Most of them on Adult Work for the pornstars/glamour models are fake. They are set up by people to make money from the videos and the photos.
Agencies where I have got babes from which did delivery the real deal are Photogirls.net and Maxes Angels.
(04-06-2010 00:43 )Ellis_Dee Wrote: [ -> ]Most of them on Adult Work for the pornstars/glamour models are fake. They are set up by people to make money from the videos and the photos.
Agencies where I have got babes from which did delivery the real deal are Photogirls.net and Maxes Angels.
But photogirls sometimes use fake pix of softcore models, who do not escort at all, so how can they be trusted when they do this?
Berg