The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
(24-05-2013 22:44 )fedup1 Wrote: [ -> ]LOOKs like we have a new male hater at channel 4 called lina prestwood,she has commissioned First Cut 1 hour series and its all male dominated how fucking sexist is that..First one is male strippers,then male streakers..Excuse me where is the female strippers docu and female streakers its always fucking men.

So she says she is full of exciting new docus ,no its not you have commissioned a load of offensive sexist docus biased and factually sexist,a good docu is balanced channel 4 is not..Going to give her shit.Suppose I will be on my own except for some others.

I dont have a problem with serious TV channels, or Five, showing documentaries about sexual matters that dont pull their punches. I really dont want to go back to the type of broadcasts that Harry Enfield lampoons where a boarding school educated chap in a suit and tie talks about "marital unpleasantness" while holding his hand over his mouth as if having a particularly unpleasant cough.

The more the likes of Channel 4 show naked men, and in this case fleeting erections, the more they make the case for naked women. The show did not demonise the male strippers, it did not make them out to be home wreakers, have STIs or be promiscuous. The worst things it said was that sometimes there are arguments about dance routines and the pay is bad.
Have these facts of pussy slips on This Morning, Cocks on Eastenders and naked bodies on The One Show been presented to Ofcom to be accountable for?

I think the point you are all missing and the reason its a problem for Babestation to show these things (aside from the girls not wanting to!) is that the Babeshows have been their own downfall when it comes to Ofcom, its fairly well known that the channels would aggressively report the other channels in order to get them in trouble, get them fined, get them closed, get girls sacked etc etc whatever their reasons may be.

I somehow do not think that the producers of Homes Under The Hammer or Hollyoaks are waiting watching This Morning or Panorama waiting to report them for their indiscretions and therefore nobody really cares
Ofcom has published its latest Broadcast Bulletin. There were just 2 complaints against Channel 4s Confessions of a Male Stripper, one about Generally Accepted Standards, the other about Sexual Material (or one complaint assessed against 2 separate categories). Seems the Campaign for Light and Daily Mail had an early night.

By contrast there were twice as many complaints (4) about Generally Accepted Standards on Countdown.

Not quite a clean slate, as there was 1 complaint against Studio 66 for alleged breach of Generally Accepted Standards - with no date specified. Does that mean someone just has a general dislike of the channel? (Complaints Assessed, not Investigated)

Thats the same number of complaints as for the Champions League promotion, or Capital Breakfast with Dave Berry and Lisa Snowdon on radio or Deal and No Deal. Detective series Scott and Bailey scored 5 complaints about Generally Accepted Standards.

There were no new investigations into babe channels.
Latest Complaints

Here is a list in alphabetical order of those programmes that received more than 10 standards complaints last week.

Report covers complaints received between Tuesday, 11 June, 2013 to Monday, 17 June, 2013

Big Brother Channel 5 Monday, 17 June, 2013, 151
Road to Referendum STV Tuesday, 4 June, 2013, 12
The Million Pound Drop Live Channel 4 Friday, 14 June, 2013, 32
Embarrassing bodies is on now on 138. My god Surprised

They should change the title to Nasty Fu*kin Bodies!

Show barely started, and already I've seen someone's nasty infected anus, some penises, horrible wounds and more.
^^^ Oh no, you mentioned penises! Now 'fedup1' will arise from his vault and start ranting on about them for the next six months. Smile
(24-06-2013 23:57 )Digital Dave Wrote: [ -> ]^^^ Oh no, you mentioned penises! Now 'fedup1' will arise from his vault and start ranting on about them for the next six months. Smile

i think he is too busy throwing buns at the feminists and shouting "burn the witch" after watching the man with the 10 stone testicle the other night
Does anyone have any idea why outside of the computer people behave so normal and old-fashioned even asexual? I find online so much open minded mentality and in the real world everyone acts like porn would be non existent.
(12-07-2013 12:31 )nantiabrown Wrote: [ -> ]Does anyone have any idea why outside of the computer people behave so normal and old-fashioned even asexual? I find online so much open minded mentality and in the real world everyone acts like porn would be non existent.

Probably because there is a lot of stigma associated with porn. Men might joke about it, but only in a jokey arms length way, and most would run a mile before admitting to their mum that they watch porn.

Also many women are in complete denial about the mismatch between their sex drive and their partners, making it difficult for couples to be honest about the man watching porn without seriously damaging the relationship, and many women find it difficult to accept that a man can jerk off to a younger, better looking, better dressed and far more willing porn model 5 nights a week without ever seriously thinking of leaving.

Online people can be honest because what they say wont follow them around at home, work or the rugby club.
WENTWORTH PRISON
Channel 5 10pm Weds

"An edgy reboot of cult Aussie classic Prisoner of Cell Block H ... the tone is more serious and the violence and sex more graphic Smile"
Reference URL's