(13-04-2012 15:18 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ] (13-04-2012 02:47 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]The large picture makes it more obvious that she is using a bong. In the thumbnail it looked like a dildo, at least to my jaded eyes late at night. Apologies for the confusion.
But I'm still struggling to see what point you're trying to make, eccles. It's a private video shot by a friend at a party, which then fell into the hands of the National Enquirer. Even if it does look like a dildo, how is it in any way related to Ofcom and the babeshows?
It was the way it was splashed across the Daily Mail website. They campaign against adult content yet have it on their own site. That children can access 24 hours a day. There were other images with nipples visible.
(13-04-2012 17:39 )mellover Wrote: [ -> ] (13-04-2012 15:18 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]how is it in any way related to Ofcom and the babeshows?
Would images of the girls toking on a bong be allowed by ofcom?
No, I very much doubt it, but what has that got to do with this? Ofcom don't regulate the newspapers.
(13-04-2012 19:49 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]It was the way it was splashed across the Daily Mail website. They campaign against adult content yet have it on their own site. That children can access 24 hours a day. There were other images with nipples visible.
But this is a thread for posting examples of Ofcom inconsistencies, not Daily Mail ones.
I think we should put the lid on this one, else it'll never end
(13-04-2012 20:09 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]No, I very much doubt it, but what has that got to do with this? Ofcom don't regulate the newspapers.
I have no interest in the ofcom debate, your not going to win them. To me it would be like complaining about the tides going in or out.
Mine was more a general comment about hypocrisy endemic in society and people that glancing at the picture and your post evoked.
Just seen The Bridge on catchup. Its a Swedish-Danish cop show on BBC, Sat 9-11 (double bill) or Mon 11-12 and Tues 11-12 (single episodes).
About halfway through episode 2 there is a sex scene featuring the lead policewoman (yes, shes blonde) and while not the most arousing it looked as if it could have been genuine. Or was it just my jaded eyes? Anatomically from the position of the blokes balls its hard to imagine wherelse his penis could have been.
Doubtless the experts will say it was just good acting and good production.
Later she walks across the room wearing just a T shirt. Its not that revealing but you dont see many leading actresses flashing their pubes on British police dramas. Hardly ever happened on The Bill.
SKY 238 has a show (Naked Britain) about nude pride. Uncensored penises and vaginas all on display and in public, yet the adult channels get fined for less
(24-04-2012 23:55 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]SKY 238 has a show (Naked Britain) about nude pride. Uncensored penises and vaginas all on display and in public, yet the adult channels get fined for less
mmmm.....I dunno.....Is there some sort of rule or guideline about non-sexual context?
(25-04-2012 02:14 )arron88 Wrote: [ -> ] (24-04-2012 23:55 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]SKY 238 has a show (N*ked Britain) about n*de pride. Unc*nsored p*nises and v*ginas all on display and in public, yet the adult channels get fined for less
Apples and Oranges.
Yes, it is the deliberate attempts at arousal which Ofcon try to supress.
(25-04-2012 02:14 )arron88 Wrote: [ -> ] (24-04-2012 23:55 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]SKY 238 has a show (N*ked Britain) about n*de pride. Unc*nsored p*nises and v*ginas all on display and in public, yet the adult channels get fined for less
Apples and Oranges.
Arronn, are you offended by vowels? Why the self-imposed letter censorship?