(14-01-2012 08:30 )Rob169 Wrote: [ -> ] (12-01-2012 23:32 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]My Daughter The Teenage Nudist
Channel 4 10-11 Thursday (now). Plus repeats.
watched a little bit of that and thaught the bit where they were handing out flyers for the naked tea party was "interesting" both the lad and lass went topless in the street handing them out but a police man eventualy came along and asked the girl to put her top back on but was't bothered about the semi naked bloke
I see your point, but sadly a topless woman in public is going to be a much bigger distraction than a topless man. We see bare chested men all the time, at the beach, in public at times, and it's not a big deal, but because the female body is so captivating, a bare chested woman in public could cause problems. Certain men would act inappropriately toward her, and she might actual cause male drivers to get distracted, and they could have an accident. Amazing what a female body can do to us
(14-01-2012 19:20 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]I see your point, but sadly a topless woman in public is going to be a much bigger distraction than a topless man. We see bare chested men all the time, at the beach, in public at times, and it's not a big deal, but because the female body is so captivating, a bare chested woman in public could cause problems. Certain men would act inappropriately toward her, and she might actual cause male drivers to get distracted, and they could have an accident. Amazing what a female body can do to us
Humanity did alright for tens of thousands of years before women were told to cover up their breasts.
Yes, in the UK it would likely create a scene if a woman was to go around topless. That's more down to public nudity being such a taboo and such a rare occurrence. It's inevitable an audience will form, each person with their own feeling of delight/disgust or just plain bemusement.
The attitude in countries with a less prudish attitude is very different. On sites like nude-in-public.com, models spend long periods of time fully nude, wandering through busy areas whilst being taped and photographed (but nothing sexual going on). They don't get anywhere near the same attention they'd get if they tried the same thing here. Most people just continue about their business, after no more than a good look and maybe a few words to whoever they're with. No gathering crowds, no wolf whistling blokes, no riot squad. In all the years such sites have been running I've read only once about the police showing up and having a word.
Then of course there's native tribes in places like the Amazon where women are always topless. The men go about their business just fine.
I'm not promoting naturism or anything.. just making the point that if nudity is a problem in this country, it's because society allowed it to become a problem.
(14-01-2012 17:26 )aceman65 Wrote: [ -> ] (13-01-2012 19:43 )dirk362 Wrote: [ -> ]It's been mentioned before I know, but Body In Balance ($ky 285) shows re-edited versions of The Lovers Guide, and last night there was full on pussy licking, fingering, and also several minutes of blowjobs - all shown in explicit detail on a free-to-view channel with no PIN, no warning etc.
Guess via this documentary I'm now well educated in how to please my partner and for her to know how to give great head.
I remember Sky showing the shows as well a couple of years back in the same uncut format. It's exempt from classification, because it's classed as educational. 
As if they could show that in schools and get away with it. 
But it does illustrate just how much of a farse our current classification & censors system is. 
BBFC Wrote:The ‘E’ symbol on video/DVD packaging indicates that the distributor believes the work to be exempt from classification.
Under the Video Recordings Act 1984, a video is an exempted work if it is designed to inform, educate or instruct; is concerned with sport, religion or music; or is a video game.
However, if such a work, including video games, depicts human sexual activity or gross violence to any significant extent it will need a BBFC classification.
The Lovers' Guide (1991) Cert 18
The Lovers' Guide 2 - Making Sex Even Better (1992) Cert 18
The Lovers' Guide 3 - Better Orgasms (1993) Cert 18
the Lovers - Guide Sex Play (2003) Cert 18
The Lovers' Guide [The Original Lovers' Guide] (2007) Cert 18
The Lovers' Guide 2 - Making Sex Even Better (2007) Cert 18 (reissue?)
The Lovers' Guide 3D - Behind The Scenes [Additional Material] (2010) Cert 18
So its not legal to show it in schools and the BBFC arent fooled by the "educational" smokescreen, unlike the guillibe fools at Ofcom who magically find something acceptable for broadcast (after 9pm) the second it has a real or fake Art/Culture/Education/Documntary/Drama label slapped on it, but would find identical content unacceptable if intended for entertainment or in an advert.
(12-01-2012 23:32 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]My Daughter The Teenage Nudist
Channel 4 10-11 Thursday (now). Plus repeats.
As several people have pointed out, the title was misleading as the show was one sided and focussed on male genitalia and completely omitted female genitals. Which is more offensive?
So WHY did Channel 4 make the show? The reason for its existence is to cater for groups of people whose needs are not met by the other Public Service Broadcasters. BBC1 appeals to the middle class, upper working class and middle aged. BBC2 the more intellectual and arty (a few years ago anyway), ITV to the working class and elderly, and Five to the Unemployed (steady on, thats a bit harsh). That leaves young adults, transgender, ethnic minortories and Scousers.
Quite where a show about willies fits in that criteria is anyones guess. Four is also legally required to be commercially viable, but a show with a misleading title all about willies is going to have a short shelf life and not pull in much advertising when repeated unlike, say, Embarrasing Bodies: Fanny Special.
Here for interest is the list of Channel 4s top 10 shows of 2011:
My Fat Gypsy Wedding - 9.71 million
My Fat Gypsy Christmas - 7.24 million
My Fat Royal Gypsy Wedding - 5.32
Embarassing Bodies - 4.85
Shameless - 4.49
The Big Fat Quiz of The Year - 4.35
Grand Designs - 4.15
Cutting Edge: Obsessive Compulsive Hoarder - 4.03
One Born Every Minute - 3.88
Embarrasing Bodies - 3.85
Bit of a patten there. Racism and having a laugh at other peoples misfortune disguised as documentary.
The News ?
Yes, the News. A naked blonde woman could be seen on a studio TV screen as Ed Miliband's leadership of the Labour Party was debated on Scotland Tonight. The raunchy clip - which appeared on STV - is thought to have been from an episode of Channel 4 drama Shameless. Viewers have been ringing in saying how much better it was than a politician.
Looks like Scotsmans campaign is achieving results. Neudes At Nine?
![[Image: article-2088740-0F8697C900000578-59_634x361.jpg]](http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/01/19/article-2088740-0F8697C900000578-59_634x361.jpg)
Video:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-...-show.html
Congratulations should be sent to yourview@stv.tv
or write to Your View, STV, Pacific Quay, Glasgow G51 1PQ
Table Dancing Diaries is just away to start on BBC3, and you say the BBC doesn't cater for pervs like us, should be worth a watch
argh on wrong forum i too complained about My daughter a teenage naturist to ofcom and channel4 citing it as misleading and just a penis programme..I was so angry seeing just penis after penis..Ofcom are fucking sexist kunts who need the sex lessons..Lets get real they censor female genatalia and allow penises anytime..They said you will never see an erection on british tv yet they have done that and they still pixellate out dont show female genatalia which is sexist and illegal.
http://www.pcpro.co.uk/blogs/2010/03/29/...oss-to-go/
Ed richards is soft,
Just now, before ten pm and on the non adult channels, an ad was shown on ITV2 of a man and woman in separate locations, getting dressed in scantily clad outfits in order to hook up with someone. Their bare asses were shown briefly as they put on their underwear, and the ad was all about sex and about a dating service meant for hooking up.
Hypocritical much?
One Eyed Monster, Horror Channel (Sky 319) 10:55-0:30 cert 18
"Riotous orror with Amber Benson (Buffy). When a porn star is killed on a remote film set, his disembodied member lives on and embarks on a killing spree. If you see it coming you're already dead!"
The porn star is Ron Jeremy, happily taking the piss out of himself. One line was "Take your sweater off Ron" "Im not wearing one". He acts well, then delivers really wooden lines when acting an actor.
One scene opens with a porn starlet rehursing her lines wearing only panties. White tablespoon sized lumps goo drop on her shoulder. Then she is found dead, mouth jammed open and a hole going through the back of her head. (Funnier than it sounds).
Non explicit, no convincing shagging scenes yet, no pussy or minger shots, and just a few shots of the killer member that could be a dildo.
So why mention it? The white gloop - cum - would be banned on babe channels but is OK on a comedy. Likewise detail of vaginal technique. Doubtless there will be other verbal and visual content that is banned in a relevant context but permitted for humour.