The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Yoga?
Hockey?
Football?
Synchronised swimming?
Jello wrestling?
(12-08-2012 20:38 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]didn't SKY Sports back in the old Astra 1 days air late night strippers after midnight

Sky Sports broadcasting strippers - is striptease classed as a sport then? Surprised
More of an art form. Good to have you back.
Classic night for strong content on the film channels, at least from a horror perspective.

Film 4 is showing Quills, cert 18, the story of the Marquis de Sade. Features Kate Winslet. Despite that the write up says "Stong language/sexual scenes/violence." Ring now Kate is reading aloud a passage about sliding a hand between a womans legs and the wetness their and has just said "Quim". The jailer appears to be masturbating (unseen). 01:10am-03:35am

The previous film was Saw 11:05pm-01:10am, cert 18, torture porn. (Still showing on +1).

The Horror Channel is showing One Eyed Monster, cert 18, 01:15am-02:50am. A killer penis is loose on the set of a porn movie and fucks people to death, starting with Ron Jeremy.

The previous film was Hellbound: Hellraiser 2, 11:20pm-01:15am and still on +1, which has just featured a walking flayed corpse that a mad doctor imagines is his beautiful wife, followed by cheezewire cutting into his flesh. 1988, not sure if this was on the video nasties list of film that were totally, categorically banned under Margaret Thatcher.

Thats 4 films featuring strong violence/gore/sexual content simultaneously. Needless to say adult channels are barely approaching cert 15 strength and the babes are not allowed to simulate masturbation or say "Quim". Unlike Kate Winslett.
[php]
(05-10-2012 01:39 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]Classic night for strong content on the film channels, at least from a horror perspective.

Film 4 is showing Quills, cert 18, the story of the Marquis de Sade. Features Kate Winslet. Despite that the write up says "Stong language/sexual scenes/violence." Ring now Kate is reading aloud a passage about sliding a hand between a womans legs and the wetness their and has just said "Quim". The jailer appears to be masturbating (unseen). 01:10am-03:35am

The previous film was Saw 11:05pm-01:10am, cert 18, torture porn. (Still showing on +1).

The Horror Channel is showing One Eyed Monster, cert 18, 01:15am-02:50am. A killer penis is loose on the set of a porn movie and fucks people to death, starting with Ron Jeremy.

The previous film was Hellbound: Hellraiser 2, 11:20pm-01:15am and still on +1, which has just featured a walking flayed corpse that a mad doctor imagines is his beautiful wife, followed by cheezewire cutting into his flesh. 1988, not sure if this was on the video nasties list of film that were totally, categorically banned under Margaret Thatcher.

Thats 4 films featuring strong violence/gore/sexual content simultaneously. Needless to say adult channels are barely approaching cert 15 strength and the babes are not allowed to simulate masturbation or say "Quim". Unlike Kate Winslett.

The women aren't allowed to say the name of a body part either on the adult channels. No penis, no vagina, because it's all so dangerous Rolleyes
(05-10-2012 01:39 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]The previous film was Hellbound: Hellraiser 2, 11:20pm-01:15am and still on +1, which has just featured a walking flayed corpse that a mad doctor imagines is his beautiful wife, followed by cheezewire cutting into his flesh. 1988, not sure if this was on the video nasties list of film that were totally, categorically banned under Margaret Thatcher.

You're a little confused there, eccles. The Video Nasties Scare was early 80s, HH2 was '88. It may have come in for some stick during the second wave and re-emergence of the video nasties nonsense in '92, but certainly not in the original.
The rules on what can be done on normal tv compared to what can be done on a shopping channel licence is stupid. if ofcom is protecting children from what is said/seen on adult channels, why aren't they protecting the very same way on normal tv!? There basically saying you don't have a right to be offended by seeing a pussy on channel 4 e.g (jimmy carr's face!) But you do have a right to be offended/protected from seeing a pussy on a 900 channel!!!!
I think ofcom should use one of these shopping channel licence's, to buy a brain!!!!
Burlesque Undressed
Sky Arts 1 midnight-2 am
Quote:In Alison Grists revealing documentary, burlesque star Immodesty Blaize examines British burlesque and the resurgence in its popularity. Also in HD.

Sky Information also has the letter W to the right of the title.

Various current burlesque stars recreate acts from the past, some more risque that the originals, and talk about "respecting" the memory of the original stars and "not feeling demeaned". So its Art then.
In the interests of research I was looking around YouTube and found this clip. It seems to be from Big Brother and has an E4 ident. An attractive woman gets in and out of a shared hottub wearing just a thong. She snogs another woman. A man cups her breasts and sucks her nipples (unclear if they have company at this point*). Another large woman bounces up and down topless. It may be age restricted but it is on YouTube so its not porn and thats official.

* edit - the soundtrack suggests they do have company.
edit 2 - sorry, Stans right, its DailyMotion. Get so much YouTube crap in every search Im starting to think everything is YouTube. Even so, it was on E4 which is not a porn channel and DailyMotion isnt (quite) a porn site either.


Sex in Water by kokinesexy1
^^ That's a dailymotion clip, not youtube.
Reference URL's