The UK Babe Channels Forum

Full Version: Mainstream TV nudity vs babeshow nudity
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
(01-08-2016 15:01 )SteveHG Wrote: [ -> ]
(27-07-2016 15:01 )Tractor boy Wrote: [ -> ]
(27-07-2016 14:51 )joesco13 Wrote: [ -> ]Can anyone reconcile how Channel 4 can broadcast "Naked Attraction" at 10pm (Monday) with full and detailed frontal nudity (male and female) including, when the first female contestant picked her male partner for a date, said male with a clear semi with the restrictions placed on dedicated babe channels grouped far away from mainstream channels on the tv guide ?

That's because the babe channels are classed as adverts, so they are far more heavily regulated.

So can't they just get themselves re-classified as harmless evening entertainment or some other category that isn't as heavily regulated, or is that too simple?! Who decides they're advertising - Ofcom? Advertising for what? Selling pics and vids?
It's more to do with the phone ins.
Surprised

Quote:'MY EYES JUST DIED' Viewers disgusted as Channel 5 shows drug dealers pushing condoms filled with drugs up their bum

https://www.thesun.co.uk/tvandshowbiz/17...their-bum/
Completely forget what it was for, but I saw an ad last night (must have been on an ITV channel) featuring a girl clearly naked in a shower, singing badly. She then leans out the shower to reach for her phone as she gets a message from friends inviting her out for karaoke later. She is covered only by the shower curtain.
I was somewhat surprised that it had managed to get past the regulators with such gratuitous nudity.
^^ I saw that ad on ch4 during the Paralympic broadcast(s).

Never believe what you see since I suspect the girl was quite decently covered.

Better be careful else a certain poster will come along and state that the nudity does not count since she was covered by the curtain Smile
(12-09-2016 16:51 )DB83 Wrote: [ -> ]^^ I saw that ad on ch4 during the Paralympic broadcast(s).

Never believe what you see since I suspect the girl was quite decently covered.

Better be careful else a certain poster will come along and state that the nudity does not count since she was covered by the curtain Smile

Haha that will be me.Smile

It is genital nudity that gets my back up. annoyed
^^ Oh. No. Not you (this time Smile )
(12-09-2016 16:51 )DB83 Wrote: [ -> ]Never believe what you see since I suspect the girl was quite decently covered.

One pair of panties or two Big Grin
Another night in front of ch4. Let's see if it's on again.
I am guessing this is the advert in question?

couldnt see a nipple in the ad...let alone any pussy??ImportantSad
Reference URL's