^^^ personally i think its the ones she has failed to mention
^^^^ One of the babes was getting slagged off big time yesterday by someone who also used to work there (oh, the bitching took place on Twitter, not on here).
imagine "that time month" with all those ladies.....
(12-01-2011 20:56 )Chilly Wrote: [ -> ]^^^^ One of the babes was getting slagged off big time yesterday by someone who also used to work there (oh, the bitching took place on Twitter, not on here).
Yeah i saw the "Stupid C**t" remark
Go on enlighten the rest of us
(12-01-2011 21:11 )astonv1 Wrote: [ -> ]Ramblings of a prick....
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/832s79
What he says might very well be true but he is still a Tw@t
Ahhh. If I'd known it was the babblings of a complete fuckwit I wouldn't have bothered asking
ohhhhhhhhh god i hope adele returns pleeeeeaaaaasssssseeeeeeeeee
To be honest, I watch the babechannels for titillation, to see an unexpected glimpse of something that Ofcom view as obscene and totally taboo to watching adults. Now we see the finger pointing as started on the whole BangBabes saga.On her networking site, Donna Duke blames the downfall on some girls crossing the decency line, vying to be the top girl or the dirtiest girl on TV. But with the Victorian morals that Ofcom now demand, is it not a near impossibility to ask these girls, who are by nature "show off's" to toe the line. Does that not go some way to tell Ofcom that a more liberal view is needed, maybe a channel that allows the girls to go a little further without being grosely indecent. Donna Duke and girls like her could find work on the more controlled channels, while the dirty girls could do it their way.
The only trouble with having different grades of programme, is that Donna's channel would soon be struggling for callers, while the more risky would boom. Unless the people who condemned BangBabes for being irresponsible stuck to their moral highground and threw in their lot with Donna's girls. Somehow I doubt it.