i looked at digital spy forum about bangmedia going bust, someone mentioned the t and c being identical to bangmedia's, this person is righthttp://www.redlightcentral.tv/terms.php
mr williams might have daily adele visits for his sausage and mash... if they move to bristol so am i if fernanda decides to travel to bristol for her daytime show... i would offer a place for the night free food, drink and bed...
(08-01-2011 01:05 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]yep i imagine all the babes have been made redundant
thats why tiff on the pad earlier was misserable. poor girl finding you lost your job on daytime show and still have to do the show.
nearly these girls will walk straight into any channel and be the best one there zarwood, lucy s, lynsey (daytime as well), dionne, tori lee, adele would be the best nightshow ladies. fernanda, emma spellar, laura bates, sammie p, alexa for the daytime shows.
fernanda on holiday i hope someone has the past the message on to her that she no longer has a channel for her excellant daytime shows.
(08-01-2011 01:07 )stueyboy Wrote: [ -> ]Maybe there is a very strong connection between these 2 channels??
If there is, maybe they can use the London based studios that Bang Babes/Xplicit have vacated
If the two channels do have a connection and we're slowly exposing it, we may be jeopardising the unveiling if there was to be one with ofcom sniffing about...
Annie Bullah Tweeted this earlier: I'm free : ) I was on contract at bang so u wernt allowed to leave I'm free now to do what I want ! I'll b bk on ur screens veryyyy soon : )
(08-01-2011 00:06 )mrichie10 Wrote: [ -> ]going bust in any business is usually bad managerment desicions question must be asked why aint this happening to any other channel
Yeah, that's pretty much the answer to all of this - Bang's 'bridge crew' were pretty much the babe channel equivalent of Albert Trotter.
I just hope they don't ever work on any more babe channels in the future (where they might get a chance to balls everything up for all themselves, their girls, their viewers, their customers and all the lay viewers); in fact, let them never work on anything more vital than an ice-cream van.*
They had this coming for a while. Sorry to all the girls and it sucks a bit for us, but boy, those useless bell-ends deserved to sink with their (proven) toxic brand of rule-breaking and stupidity.
*Just let me know which one, okay? I don't want food poisoning from a sexy-looking vanilla 99 made with reckless levels of such unstable E-numbers and flavour enhancers as Idiozine and Incompetin.
What a kick in the nads it'll be if the likes of Emma Spellar, Sammie P and Dannii end up on BS Days/Nights
I think all this is the worst news possible for my enjoyment of the Babechannels, as The Pad/BBs had an absolutely superb line-up of girls.
That group of fantastic models will now be broken up for good.
They also had the best production, arguably with their sets, but definitely their lighting in particular. Their lighting was excellent and was never an issue like on other channels e.g. Elite TV using a combination of lighting which is often too bright/too dark.
A good example of how good BangBabes' production was can be seen with Rochelle:
Compared to Rochelle on BS, she suddenly looked more attractive on BBs, due to the smaller graphics, so you could actually see her properly (!!) + the neutral lighting showed off her gorgeous light brown skin.
How can it be that a channel with such an awesome line up of Day and Night Show models can get themselves into such a mess??
Over the months (and years) many other channels must have looked at The Pad/BBs and wished they could have just half the number of stunning girls they have - this is very bad news indeed.
(08-01-2011 01:34 )Krill Liberator Wrote: [ -> ]I don't want food poisoning from a sexy-looking vanilla 99
surely a 69 would be more appropriate?
