The UK Babe Channels Forum

(27-11-2010 16:49 )gazfc Wrote: [ -> ]You seriously need to get out more if you think you can compare the two.

I can and I did. It's a perfectly acceptable comparison and has many parallels.

I hadn't seen lollipop gate either, now I understand the fuss.

Here's something to ponder on. Ever thought about the role that the other babe channels might have had on this? I mean, it's fairly well known that these channels have grassed each other up to Ofcom in the past. Nah, I reckon some of those complaints that Bang Media received were indeed from rival broadcasters. Not to mention the fact that some of the producers/owners of these channels really don't get on.

(27-11-2010 17:14 )TheWatcher Wrote: [ -> ]

(27-11-2010 15:33 )frankie007 Wrote: [ -> ]Can someone explain to me what "Lollipopgate" is? Its been mentioned a few times but i hav no idea? Any help would be appreciated.

For the members who missed this last year.
I am posting this as an ordinary forum member, not as a mod, and it may get removed.
It does not imply that the original vid can be reposted.
But since Bang lied to us about the current problem, I feel free to repost this gif.
Its better quality than my original gif that was removed last year.
Thanks to the original uploader of the vid from which this gif was made, I can't remember who it was.

HA, that's brilliant!!!

I never saw that moment, and only heard about it, but I had assumed that Amanda inserted the lollypop from the side, and that while it was an obvious insertion, that not much detail was shown. Boy was I wrong That's like open leg to the camera, in goes lollypop! HA!

I still think that should be allowed. Where's the video for this? Also, the women should NOT have been punished, but the camera man should have instead, for actually filming it. Great stuff!

Well, I can't believe that The Watcher doesn't remember who the original up-loader of Lolligate was.

I still have the full 40 minute session of this, but I'm certainly not posting it on here again. I took enough shit and flack the first time.

If Dazaman wants to post it on his forum, I can supply him with my download link if he's in agreement. But please don't PM me for it any longer, as I will not give it out any longer that way.

Lollipopgate was only censored on here. There were plenty of other places where you could download it. You just needed to know where to look.

I'm sure StanTheMan is speaking 'tongue in cheek' with his comparisons to South Africa.

i reckon by christmas there will be a new name and management licences.

i thought lollipopgate was to do with lolly badcock since she was on bangbabes b4 bs

comparing the serious 25 year struggle the black population in south africa had due to apartiheld, to ofcom and bangbabes. stantheman that is the most retarded thing i have seen posted on this forum, and cwpussylove posts here.

idiotic dont do it justice

(27-11-2010 17:58 )StanTheMan Wrote: [ -> ]I can and I did. It's a perfectly acceptable comparison and has many parallels.

So in your eyes the persecution of millions upon millions of people because of the colour of their skin is the same as a channel having their license revoked. . . . . . OK Then


It's not like ofcom have denied you ever seeing a pair of tits again, there's still quite a few channels still going and I dont know if your aware or not but if you google 'boobs' or 'pussy' you'll be presented with billions of pages where you can see them whenever you want, enjoy!!


Oh sorry I forgot, Mental institutes have filters on the pc's to stop you from veiwing them pages, I'm really really sorry for getting your hopes up.