(11-06-2017 13:18 )SecretAgent Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2017 12:47 )SOCATOA Wrote: [ -> ]Ivory ban lifting,
You keep saying this but they have not said they are lifting the Ivory ban - its just you scaremongering. The 2015 manifesto said they would EXTEND the ban from where it is now to include all ivory. At present it is only legal to deal in ivory from before some date decades ago and that's how the law will remain
Only ivory Pre 1947 can be sold legally. Cameron did in the 2015 manifesto say they would continue the ban. No mention of ivory ban in May's 2017 manifesto. but the CONservatives have decided to drop their previous commitment to introduce a total ban on ivory trade in Britain. This has been done after heavy pressure from wealthy antique dealers, notably, The British Antique Dealers Association, who's President is CONservative MP and pal of Theresa May, Lady Victoria Borwick.
(11-06-2017 10:07 )babelover48 Wrote: [ -> ]you can point all back to the referendum vote, Cameron resigning I now even dare to think that if she had gone to the country weeks after that referendum result, she still would not have gained a strong mandate for the Brexit Cameron created this mess May has just fucked it up further
Cameron was often called the heir to Blair, I don't think people realised May was a clown like Brown
EU don't need to threaten us at all, the Tories are shooting themselves in the foot enough. We might get a good deal out of sympathy
(11-06-2017 14:43 )SOCATOA Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2017 13:18 )SecretAgent Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2017 12:47 )SOCATOA Wrote: [ -> ]Ivory ban lifting,
You keep saying this but they have not said they are lifting the Ivory ban - its just you scaremongering. The 2015 manifesto said they would EXTEND the ban from where it is now to include all ivory. At present it is only legal to deal in ivory from before some date decades ago and that's how the law will remain
Only ivory Pre 1947 can be sold legally.
Correct and they are not proposing to change that so they are NOT REMOVING THE BAN ON MODERN IVORY SALES
(11-06-2017 14:50 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ]EU don't need to threaten us at all, the Tories are shooting themselves in the foot enough. We might get a good deal out of sympathy
Aaahhh I see it all now.
All part of Mrs May's masterplan
.
(11-06-2017 15:01 )SecretAgent Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2017 14:43 )SOCATOA Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2017 13:18 )SecretAgent Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2017 12:47 )SOCATOA Wrote: [ -> ]Ivory ban lifting,
You keep saying this but they have not said they are lifting the Ivory ban - its just you scaremongering. The 2015 manifesto said they would EXTEND the ban from where it is now to include all ivory. At present it is only legal to deal in ivory from before some date decades ago and that's how the law will remain
Only ivory Pre 1947 can be sold legally.
Correct and they are not proposing to change that so they are NOT REMOVING THE BAN ON MODERN IVORY SALES
Which begs the question, when this was said during the election camaign, why no denial from the CONservatives. Or did i miss this?? I would think they would know it would cost them votes. They were quick enough to refute other claims.
Reshuffle now going on. Never has the phrase " rearranging the deck chairs on the Titanic " been more apt.
She doesn't learn
Jeremy Hunt's to remain as Secretary of State for Health.
So that's 1.7 million NHS workers she's still annoyed.
(11-06-2017 19:56 )Charlemagne Wrote: [ -> ]She doesn't learn
Jeremy Hunt's to remain as Secretary of State for Health.
So that's 1.7 million NHS workers she's still annoyed.
Did you honestly think she would sack or move Cunt?? So Juncker advised May to hold the election to make things easier
Might have known it was those european basterds that fucked things up. Poor Theresa, she has been misunderstood. Talk about strong and stable
