I will keep this short last night was Black Wednesday 2.
^^^^^
wtf??? last night as bad as the infamous black Wednesday night, don't think so myself. are you saying this just because gemma hiles was on doing a tease show, given you are so anti s66 tease shows and because dani daniels was on. thought last night was a good midweek night myself
Q1: Does Gemma deserve some credit? Yes due to extending her hours to cover an extra 2.5 hours. She has always been a dayshow babe who does extended naughty hour type performances and not beyond so a dose of reality in terms of expectation is called for imo.
Q2: Do S66 deserve criticism? Definitely.
They should always be in a situation where there is always one babe more than there are channels. So this means 4 babes across 3 channels. If all four turn up then when one goes on a break the fourth one steps in.
If one cancels there are still enough babes to cover each channel.
S66 may say they could not arrange cover by a conventional nightshow babe.
Hardly surprising seeing as their options are limited due to a pitifully small roster. Last night the cover was only for 2.5 hours and not by a conventional nightshow babe. That is no fault of Gemma's its just the way it is. Bottom line - S66 dug themselves ahole a while ago that has been getting ever deeper and now they are paying the price. The organisation of this channel is a total shambles and completely indefensible.
The quality of shows has gone down the pan.
Laziness and complacency is now deep rooted at S66 imo to such a degree the self applied humiliation is making S66 an utter laughing stock.
(12-06-2014 10:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]for once s66 did sort out a cover babe and yet they are still getting flack????
Who was the night time cover babe STD 66 sorted out ?, i didn't see one, i saw a daytime girl just doing a few hours of a extended tease show, she then left i assume and that was it, did a proper night girl then appear ?, or did they have just 2 night girls covering all their channels for many night time hours that were left, i don't actually know as i went to bed .
pretty much agree with you here snookered. agree completely with what your saying about gemma hiles. as for your second point, agree a babeshow should have 1 more babe than they have channels, so in s66's case they should have 4 babes on given they have 3 channels for all the reasons you say. agree also the roster is smaller than it needs to be and does need to be added to to increase their options if like last night a babe isn't on
disagree s66 is a laughing stock though snookered and don't think the quality of the shows has gone down as bad as you say they have though
mrmystery the cover for mica was gemma hiles, but it was cover none the less after that yes s66 had 2 girls covering 3 channels once she had left.
Studio 66 need to arrange last minute backup for when a babe can't make a show.
One option is to use a trailist who is willing to come on the show at short notice.....
Well according the S66 statisticians & accountants on here, the US babes will be making so much money for S66, that they probably don't need any other babes on anyway
(12-06-2014 10:39 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]They should always be in a situation where there is always one babe more than there are channels. So this means 4 babes across 3 channels.
They don't even have 3 channels anymore.
(11-06-2014 06:17 )Danzig Wrote: [ -> ] (11-06-2014 02:30 )anchorman Wrote: [ -> ]Who's the new boring chick?
She seems some what shy 
And they have gone and booked her in for another 3 shows it looks like.
Dani Daniels who I have seen in some vids,OK but not outstanding.I still stick with my original theory that some of S66's problems seem to have arisen since they took on the RLC girls.There only seem to be a handful of their original girls left(lilly,Adele,Caty)Jess West is AWOL and Ashley Emma has jumped ship.Who knows?
(12-06-2014 10:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ] (12-06-2014 01:42 )☆☆D☆T☆☆ Wrote: [ -> ] (12-06-2014 01:35 )Liverred Wrote: [ -> ]Why have Gemma Hiles on a nightshow when she won't even go topless? I don't see the point.
To cover someone who wasn't on.
By the time she had finished she had done a 12 and half hour shift, some girls on this channel only do a 5 hour night shift, give her some credit?
for once im in agreement with you **D*T** gemma should be given lots of credit for agreeing to stay on and cover for mica last night. she could have quite easily said no, given she had done a full dayshow, but she stayed on and did a good tease show and so what if she didn't go fully topless
for once s66 did sort out a cover babe and yet they are still getting flack????
no they didn't they used a daybabe on a nightshow, plus gemma could have easily said no but she wanted the extra money despite not delivering a night time performance, but let me guess her phone stats were good and that's all that matters isn't it