(30-05-2014 00:24 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]hopefully this example im about to give will help. when a babeshow babe has a boob job (which is when personal attacks on them often happen) most forum members will make fair criticism like "don't like her boob job" but some forum members (thankfully a minority) will say something like "don't like her boob job, she has butchered/mutilated her body" which is a personal attack/insult on a babe
Why is that a 'personal attack'? It's an opinion. Speaking for myself I think that most boob jobs are totally unnecessary and an act of self mutilation. That's my opinion (shared by many others) and not an attack, except possibly on the lack of common sense of the person involved.
As has been pointed out thousands of times to you, this is not a fan site. You have posted many opinionated posts yourself which, if we were to apply your own ludicrous criteria, would constitute 'attacks'. I'm sure mr mystery could produce numerous examples if he so wished.
It's getting to the stage now where any comment that isn't sickeningly supportive (girl x had a great night) is an 'attack' in your eyes. Time to wise up Rammy.
Me and Digi tile Dave agree on the boob jobs being unnecessary for the most part.
I knew all along that some day, me and Digi tile Dave would begin to share similarities, that some day we might truly find love between us.
Digi?
Dave?
Don't pretend you don't feel the same way...
Call me
This forum is fun!
I am appalled at my performance on the forum tonight.
What a prize @#nt I am.
Oh bugger I have just personally attacked myself - doh
(30-05-2014 02:10 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Me and Digi tile Dave agree on the boob jobs being unnecessary for the most part.
I knew all along that some day, me and Digi tile Dave would begin to share similarities, that some day we might truly find love between us.
This forum is fun!
Please stop personally attacking me with your love.
Yeah attacking someone with love is an invasion of forum space which is grossly offensive
.
(30-05-2014 01:55 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Rammy you're doing it again, now you've just patronised snookered, why do you keep patronising other members, has snookered ever personally attacked a babe, if he has thats news to me 
Why are you saying well done to an established forum member, stop trying to post as if you are chairing a meeting FFS!!!!!!!!!
I am trying my best to reason with you but yet again you've just brought up the subject matter of babes being attacked and this time your comments are aimed at snookered.
I'm not saying anything untrue about you Rammy, you're the one that is making the posts about attacks, nobody else, just how many forum members do you intend to patronise tonight.
READ MY POST FOR PETES SAKE!!!!!! I NEVER SAID SNOOKERED HAD ATTACKED A BABE!!!!!! AND NEITHER WAS I PATRONISING HIM OR ANY OTHER FORUM MEMBERS TONIGHT!!!! STOP SAYING I AM PLEASE!!!!!! so yes you are saying untrue things about me
I was commenting on his post about s66 saying he's entitled to his opinion on s66 and that he wasn't boring me sensless about it. where in that have I said he has attacked a babe????? regarding personal attacks d*t has personally attacked me and called me a troll which is definitely out of order and unacceptable behaviour
digital dave for me comments like a babe has mutilated herself does overstep the mark for me because the babe in question can see the posts and will get upset by them. no need for me to wise up at all thank you very much and it's nowhere near the stage your on about
is this it for tonight then?
