What annoys me about this channel is how damn expensive it is to call it, plus a £2 connection charge per call before you've even had chance to say "boo" to anyone.
At those costs no wonder there is so much phone waving, though that also gies for the other channels in the so called big 3 too.
If normal calls on your mobile phone plan were so expensive you'd soon dump it! Makes my original mobile in the mid 90s and it's 50p per minute calls at cheap rate seem cheap lol!
(30-05-2014 00:42 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]even loving babes on this channel who are currently at the side of the road with a puncture on their car, says it all 
Ah, but I'll bet she "used the side of the road well" and "looked good in her anorak"
(30-05-2014 00:24 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]FOR GOD SAKES IM NOT ATTACKING/SLATING ANYONE FOR CRITISCISM!!!!!!!!!! some forum members clearly have the wrong end of the stick here with the point I was trying to make earlier with no goggles on at all as IM NOT A S66 FANBOY FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME!!!! the point was criticism is fine, but there is a way to do it without going into personally attacking/insulting a babeshow babe.
hopefully this example im about to give will help. when a babeshow babe has a boob job (which is when personal attacks on them often happen) most forum members will make fair criticism like "don't like her boob job" but some forum members (thankfully a minority) will say something like "don't like her boob job, she has butchered/mutilated her body" which is a personal attack/insult on a babe
Rammy why did you bring up the subject of "attacks" against the girls in this thread ?.
You have also quoted mine and SB's posts and went on to tell us what is or isn't OK to post, neither of us personally "attacked" the girls in our posts, neither did anyone else that i could see
http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...pid1469812
So why have you brought the subject up when it had no bearing on what was being posted ?
(30-05-2014 00:48 )RatedR Wrote: [ -> ]someones trying to get the thread removed 
Like this post.........good laugh
Reminds me of "Comical Ali" in Gulf war 2.
"Sadam is still in charge, and no Americans in Baghdad................just stepping out, I may be some time.............."
(30-05-2014 00:57 )mr mystery Wrote: [ -> ] (30-05-2014 00:24 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]FOR GOD SAKES IM NOT ATTACKING/SLATING ANYONE FOR CRITISCISM!!!!!!!!!! some forum members clearly have the wrong end of the stick here with the point I was trying to make earlier with no goggles on at all as IM NOT A S66 FANBOY FOR THE UMPTEENTH TIME!!!! the point was criticism is fine, but there is a way to do it without going into personally attacking/insulting a babeshow babe.
hopefully this example im about to give will help. when a babeshow babe has a boob job (which is when personal attacks on them often happen) most forum members will make fair criticism like "don't like her boob job" but some forum members (thankfully a minority) will say something like "don't like her boob job, she has butchered/mutilated her body" which is a personal attack/insult on a babe
Rammy why did you bring up the subject of "attacks" against the girls in this thread ?.
You have also quoted mine and SB's posts and went on to tell us what is or isn't OK to post, neither of us personally "attacked" the girls in our posts, neither did anyone else that i could see http://www.babeshows.co.uk/showthread.ph...pid1469812
So why have you brought the subject up when it had no bearing on what was being posted ?
I brought up the girls being attacked issue in this thread to give an example to the point I was making about criticism and the way it can be done without personally attacking a babeshow babe as I felt some forum members were getting the wrong end of the stick with the point I was trying to make. I quoted you and scottishblokes posts because you were commenting on whether or not it was ok to be overly critical, so just added my opinion on what you and Scottishbloke were saying about this. in no way did I tell you what is or isn't ok to post or said you or scottishbloke attacked babes. I never did
Right.
Firstly this thread serves an invaluable purpose.
It may be boring to some but not half as boring as the shows S66 are churning out night after night.
Time and again the same criticisms keep being made - yes I agree with that.
And do you know why?
Because S66 keep on making the same errors over and over again.
The management of this once great channel has gone to pot and nobody will convince me otherwise.
Defending the current output and shambolic scheduling is defending the indefensible.
This channel is an utter disgrace at present and not worthy of even a tenth of the cost of the calls.
If they improve the product most of the criticism in this thread will cease.
Surely to goodness that is obvious.
The culture of this channel has become fundamentally bone idle and unimaginative.
The can't be arsed channel who really could not care less and think that a token good stint here or there will do.
Well it won't do. It is a reprehensible attitude that fills me with utter contempt and anger.
The performances are poor because nobody seems to really have the will or enthusiasm to make them better.
That is not a personal attack it is just an assessment on the quality of show on offer.
Personal attacks are imo name calling and personal insults.
Absolutely nothing I have read in this thread has appeared to me to be a personal attack on anyone.
It is a cutting and realistic assessment on a channel that has lost its way badly and I for one will continue to keep posting in this thread and, no doubt bore some people senseless because I believe in constructive criticism and the idea that we should point out failings to make things better.
If and when this channel ever pulls its socks up I will shut up but not until.
S66 - get your house in order and do it now. Your ship is almost sunk!!
(30-05-2014 01:18 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]I brought up the girls being attacked issue in this thread to give an example to the point I was making about criticism and the way it can be done without personally attacking a babeshow babe as I felt some forum members were getting the wrong end of the stick with the point I was trying to make. I quoted you and scottishblokes posts because you were commenting on whether or not it was ok to be overly critical, so just added my opinion on what you and Scottishbloke were saying about this. in no way did I tell you what is or isn't ok to post or said you or scottishbloke attacked babes. I never did
Rammy neither me or mr mystery were asking anything of the sort so please don't patronise any one of us
We've both been on this forum long enough to know what is acceptable to post and what isn't, besides you'd be the last person we'd go to if we required any advice
You were the one that decided to bring up the subject of babes being attacked, nobody else.
Here's my advice to you, next time you decide to post please keep it within the correct context and relevance to the subject
PS - You might want to go to B&Q tomorrow and purchase yourself a spade in order to dig yourself out of the hole that you've just made for yourself
not boring me senseless snookered. youre entitled to your opinion on s66 which you've made very loud and clear in your post and you've done it in the right way without personally attacking anyone.
hopefully it's loud enough for s66 bosses to listen to and take on board what you've said.
scottishbloke stop saying untrue things about me. I never patronised you, mrmystery or any other forum member, where the hell have you got that I did????!!!!! and neither was I trying to manipulate anything that you or any other forum member has said, another comment that is untrue.
mrmystery asked why I had brought up the issue of girls being personally attacked in here, so I explained to him why I did, which was to clarify the point I made earlier in this thread about criticism which I felt some forum members hadn't got, simple as that.
Rammy, you are the greatest troll ever, i aspire to be like you, teach me how you do it
Rammy you're doing it again, now you've just patronised snookered, why do you keep patronising other members, has snookered ever personally attacked a babe, if he has thats news to me
Why are you saying well done to an established forum member, stop trying to post as if you are chairing a meeting FFS!!!!!!!!!
I am trying my best to reason with you but yet again you've just brought up the subject matter of babes being attacked and this time your comments are aimed at snookered.
I'm not saying anything untrue about you Rammy, you're the one that is making the posts about attacks, nobody else, just how many forum members do you intend to patronise tonight.