(30-05-2014 02:26 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]READ MY POST FOR PETES SAKE!!!!!! I NEVER SAID SNOOKERED HAD ATTACKED A BABE!!!!!! AND NEITHER WAS I PATRONISING HIM OR ANY OTHER FORUM MEMBERS TONIGHT!!!! STOP SAYING I AM PLEASE!!!!!! so yes you are saying untrue things about me
I was commenting on his post about s66 saying he's entitled to his opinion on s66 and that he wasn't boring me sensless about it. where in that have I said he has attacked a babe?????
No but you brought up the comment personally attacking which was out of context and completely unnecessary. Why did you even bring it up, what's wrong with you, it was patronising, you didn't have to say it and you had no justification either to.
(30-05-2014 01:40 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]youre entitled to your opinion on s66 which you've made very loud and clear in your post and you've done it in the right way without personally attacking anyone.
You still haven't answered my question Rammy, what made you think that snookered would have attacked the babes to begin with, when has he ever. You don't seem to realise just how bloody insulting this comment is whether intended or not you still said it.
Watched some Lucy tonight. Numerous nonsensical cuts to the censor screen throughout her stint, and shots that they were perfectly happy to show a couple of weeks ago were obviously a no go tonight. After watching a fair bit of S66 over the last couple of weeks, I've come to realise that those censor free Lucy and Yasmine shows from two weeks ago were a freak occurrence, the vast majority of the shows are still just as crap as they have been for ages.
(30-05-2014 02:56 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ] (30-05-2014 02:26 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]READ MY POST FOR PETES SAKE!!!!!! I NEVER SAID SNOOKERED HAD ATTACKED A BABE!!!!!! AND NEITHER WAS I PATRONISING HIM OR ANY OTHER FORUM MEMBERS TONIGHT!!!! STOP SAYING I AM PLEASE!!!!!! so yes you are saying untrue things about me
I was commenting on his post about s66 saying he's entitled to his opinion on s66 and that he wasn't boring me sensless about it. where in that have I said he has attacked a babe?????
No but you brought up the comment personally attacking which was out of context and completely unnecessary. Why did you even bring it up, what's wrong with you, it was patronising, you didn't have to say it and you had no justification either to.
(30-05-2014 01:40 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]youre entitled to your opinion on s66 which you've made very loud and clear in your post and you've done it in the right way without personally attacking anyone.
You still haven't answered my question Rammy, what made you think that snookered would have attacked the babes to begin with, when has he ever. You don't seem to realise just how bloody insulting this comment is whether intended or not you still said it.
I've already said why I brought up the babes being attacked which was to explain the point I made last night about criticism so for me it was justified.
Regarding your question for me regarding snookered147, I haven't answered it because there isn't a question to answer. I NEVER SAID SNOOKERED147 INSULTED ANY BABES!!!!!!! I was commenting on his post where he voiced his opinions on s66 and nowhere in my reply to it did i say he had attacked any babeshow babes, so why are you keeping on saying I did and also how can I have insulted snookered147 when I never said he had attacked babes
I sense a move to the Twilight zone part of the forum may be imminent for some of this thread
.
I'm off to verbally personally attack and patronise myself
.
All I've read is. BLAH BLAM SPLAT POW
The last few pages of this thread are like watching batman with Adam west
(30-05-2014 00:50 )HoneyRocks Wrote: [ -> ]What annoys me about this channel is how damn expensive it is to call it, plus a £2 connection charge per call before you've even had chance to say "boo" to anyone.
At those costs no wonder there is so much phone waving, though that also gies for the other channels in the so called big 3 too.
Agree, S66 & RLC are the most expensive to call now on mobile and therefore fair game in my opinion for more scrutiny on the product there are giving compared to others.
