(23-06-2014 12:20 )teewee Wrote: [ -> ] (23-06-2014 11:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]^^^
S66usa reducing the picture quality? Disagree here. The past 2 nights on s66usa the pic quality has improved significantly and is now as good as the other s66 channels and the other babeshows in UK. Disagree as well of your on about the non s66usa channels. Pic quality is very good on them
Well I am watching on a samsung 46in smart tv and I agree with bunnybc.The quality last night was pathetic.It was like watching a stream on a laptop with dial up broadband.If I wanted picture break up and pixalated picture,then last night was the night.Total fail in my opinion.
Indeed, my AV gear is top notch and for some time now there has been a marked difference between Sky channels 912 (better) and 942 (worse). Last night both these channels dropped quality considerably. I believe that those who take the piss and/or can see no difference either need to invest in some modern kit or pay a visit to Specsavers.
The Sky TV picture quality of the STD 66 channels seemed to be worse than usual for me last night as well, i din't bother checking out the USA channel so can't comment on that channel, but if it was better than it has been and the others STD 66 uk channels are worse then maybe they are robbing Peter to pay Paul picture quality wise ?
The RLC picture quality seemed to be worse than ever last night as well by the way, and the Cellcast picture quality is always crap for me .
(23-06-2014 13:41 )bunnybc Wrote: [ -> ] (23-06-2014 12:20 )teewee Wrote: [ -> ] (23-06-2014 11:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]^^^
S66usa reducing the picture quality? Disagree here. The past 2 nights on s66usa the pic quality has improved significantly and is now as good as the other s66 channels and the other babeshows in UK. Disagree as well of your on about the non s66usa channels. Pic quality is very good on them
Well I am watching on a samsung 46in smart tv and I agree with bunnybc.The quality last night was pathetic.It was like watching a stream on a laptop with dial up broadband.If I wanted picture break up and pixalated picture,then last night was the night.Total fail in my opinion.
Indeed, my AV gear is top notch and for some time now there has been a marked difference between Sky channels 912 (better) and 942 (worse). Last night both these channels dropped quality considerably. I believe that those who take the piss and/or can see no difference either need to invest in some modern kit or pay a visit to Specsavers.
Yep, 942 broadcasts on the same transponder as the Red Light channels and Storm, all of which suffer from low bitrate and crappy PQ. In fact, pretty much all of the channels on 11390 V have lousy picture quality.
Can't comment on the quality last night as I didn't watch, but the other two S66 channels are usually much better than 942.
942 is worse than ever, I can confirm
Unless Cara is currently in a thick fog
It's terrible. Just a proper mess right now
Nights is only worth watching for Claire since Lilly and Ashley left.
Elite/Studio used to have the best looking women by far. Not any more. It's like they'll take anybody on now
If Cara or Claire left I'd never watch it again
Back when it was called Elite you really got the sense it was called Elite for a reason. I.e babes you will not find anywhere else, but as they switch around so much nowadays, classic babes like Ashley etc switching stations it's kind of lost a touch of its magic
Still love it for a variety of babes, Cara Brett, Jennifer Jade, Rachel Louise, Fernanda etc though so I'm not complaining that much
Out of interest,I watch Studio 1 on 11344H-27500-2/3,great reception best out of all their channels.
Studio66 on 912 on my SKY box is best for picture and quality by far
Same blonde and brunette.. again. No variety
(27-06-2014 12:46 )Tori Lee Addict Wrote: [ -> ]Studio66 on 912 on my SKY box is best for picture and quality by far
Yes by about a million miles I'd say.