The UK Babe Channels Forum

(26-04-2014 11:23 )Bandwagon Wrote: [ -> ]

(26-04-2014 11:05 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]get back to how they were in their heyday which aint going to happen

Bit negative that Spammy

yeah I know that but think it's a realistic thing to say regarding the babeshows

(26-04-2014 11:05 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]NO I AM NOT A PLANT FOR ANY OF THE BABECHANNELS!!!!!

Too busy with your call stats

yep can't do multiple things at the same time I'm a bloke after all

I agree with everything SB has said, both on this thread and the general thread about the channels.

The final straw for me was Tuesday. You had a cracking babe like Mica on but she never took her top off once the whole night! And there was only the occasional, brief flash of her Saint Mauritz. I haven't bothered tuning in since.

Another thing which grinds my gears is the tease hour babe saying 'I will take my top off for next caller who asks' when she has no intention of doing so. Surely they could get done for false advertising although certain people on here think it's OK to blatantly lie if it gets the calls in.

Piss poor.

a babeshow babe main job is to bring in the calls so will say things on the mic that will get people to give them a call. therefore doesn't bother me what me what a babeshow babe says on the mic. I think you should always take what a babeshow babe says on the mic with a pinch of salt

^^^^ but what happens if we've ran out of salt? Maybe a pinch of Pepper with some Garlic?

(27-04-2014 11:10 )JamesStandford Wrote: [ -> ]^^^^ but what happens if we've ran out of salt? Maybe a pinch of Pepper with some Garlic?

Wash away the truth with gallons of yummy delicious Brown Nose Ale

(27-04-2014 10:52 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]

(27-04-2014 07:45 )Phonebook Wrote: [ -> ]Another thing which grinds my gears is the tease hour babe saying 'I will take my top off for next caller who asks' when she has no intention of doing so. Surely they could get done for false advertising although certain people on here think it's OK to blatantly lie if it gets the calls in.

Piss poor.

a babeshow babe main job is to bring in the calls so will say things on the mic that will get people to give them a call. therefore doesn't bother me what me what a babeshow babe says on the mic. I think you should always take what a babeshow babe says on the mic with a pinch of salt

It may not bother you Rammy, but it may bother the callers who expect the girls to do what they advertise on the mic on screen when they spend their hard earned money to call them.
It may also bother Ofcom and then STD 66 if someone complained, it looks like there are rules covering this sort of thing, from what i can make out it could be classed as misleading advertisement by the girl presenters as these channels are classed as adverts by Ofcom . check out this link .
http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/binarie...idance.pdf
Ofcom say in section 8 in the link i have given that babe channel broadcasters should take note that they should not materially mislead viewers and should take note of the relevant rules of section 3 in the bcap code concerning misleading advertising .

It would be quite easy for the regulators to check if the girls were falsely advertising on tv what they will do if someone asks them to do something on the phone, tv broadcasts have to be recorded under Ofcom rules and the phone calls have to be recorded as part of Phone Pay Plus regulations .

Ah brown nose ale the only drink up there with lying bitch yellow snow on delicious flavour

(27-04-2014 07:45 )Phonebook Wrote: [ -> ]the tease hour babe saying 'I will take my top off for next caller who asks' when she has no intention of doing so. Surely they could get done for false advertising

Unless you were the next caller you wouldn't have any proof.