Ok to end this sillyness...
Would anyone like to step forward and say that they would like S66 to close down and why?
If no one steps up then can those saying that there are people on this forum who want S66 to close can put a sock in it, and if people do come forward we can discuss the merits of their case for S66 closing (should be fun that one
)
I think otherwise we are all in danger of assuming we understand the reasons for people supporting/criticising S66 when we don't always
^^^ Indeed. Nobody here has said that they want S66 to close. Those saying otherwise are just trolling for effect. They should know better.
(15-06-2014 14:51 )snookered147 Wrote: [ -> ]We are not anti S66.
We are anti what it has become.
We do not want S66 to fail or close.
We want it to restore itself to former glories.
We are not slating S66 just for the fun of it.
We are highlighting its failings and wanting them to be addressed.
This is not a vendetta.
It is a plea to the channel not to destroy itself through incompetent management and strategy.
A plea to say please please think again.
Please 
.
Pretty please .
Beg .
Grovel .
My own post from a while back is above
.
I was not intending to post on this thread today but to be honest I am getting a bit sick and tired of this 'Oh you want the end of S66' stuff.
So people want S66 out of business do they?
Evidence time!!
Find me the post where someone has clearly stated they want the end of S66 and want it out of business. Come on where is it?
I'm waiting...........
Either that or prove that predictions of demise mean the same as desire for demise.
Come on I'm still waiting
.
The truth is there is no such post and no evidence to seriously suggest a desire for S66 to close.
There has been a lot of deserved criticism and piss taking.
But that is the fault of S66 and nobody else.
Time and again I and others have highlighted the failings of this channel and yet things have declined further and further.
I have no reason to feel embarrassed, that should be left to S66.
So its time to put up or shut up and stop insulting the intelligence of those of us who have every right to slate S66 for its own self inflicted deficiencies.
Total piffle
.
(20-06-2014 00:00 ) Wrote: [ -> ]They need more than jade adele to save this So-Call Babe Channel. lack of night girls, lack of working webstreams, poor communication from their staff to the customers.
Pull the plug please
I'm leaving the person anonymous, but a few have said things like this, but I emphasise, a few. Which is why I withdrew from the thread, somewhat. This is the kind of thing that I, personally,was alluding to.
(10-07-2014 14:24 )RatedR Wrote: [ -> ]a few have said things like this
Exactly.
But maybe we imagined these things and are "trolling for effect" as Digital Dave would have us believe.
Delia and Savannah Mai - perhaps the sick puppy can make a recovery after all
Now, about these crap producers and camera men.......
(10-07-2014 14:24 )RatedR Wrote: [ -> ] (20-06-2014 00:00 ) Wrote: [ -> ]They need more than jade adele to save this So-Call Babe Channel. lack of night girls, lack of working webstreams, poor communication from their staff to the customers.
Pull the plug please
I'm leaving the person anonymous, but a few have said things like this, but I emphasise, a few. Which is why I withdrew from the thread, somewhat. This is the kind of thing that I, personally,was alluding to.
you do know that if we click the green arrow in the quoted post it takes us to the original post thus revealing the posters identity.
just sayin.
(10-07-2014 12:00 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]Think most forum members don't want s66 to fold and do put forward their criticisms in this thread in a constructive way along with their suggestions for how s66 can improve. However there is a small number of forum members I think who do have an agenda against s66 bad and are hellbent on wanting it out of business, they have used this thread for their agenda and as ratedr has said, has caused the thread to break down
yeah like you would shed a tear if BS closed down, i don't normally watch S66 much as most of my faves are on BS, but i don't want S66 to go bust cos then a lot of the girls would join BS probably, personally what i dislike about S66 is the fact they only have one or two girls on every night and the fact that most are not my type, i rate RLC as the worst channel for babes, sets and performances atm, though at least they have 4 girls on all night, people moan about bed sets on S66, but that stupid big chair on RLC does my head in, seeing yasmine naked on a bed is better than seeing her sit on a chair with some silly dom outfit on
(10-07-2014 14:24 )RatedR Wrote: [ -> ] (20-06-2014 00:00 ) Wrote: [ -> ]They need more than jade adele to save this So-Call Babe Channel. lack of night girls, lack of working webstreams, poor communication from their staff to the customers.
Pull the plug please
I'm leaving the person anonymous, but a few have said things like this, but I emphasise, a few. Which is why I withdrew from the thread, somewhat. This is the kind of thing that I, personally,was alluding to.
The plaintive cry of the frustrated punter I read it as, not a reasoned call for closure. Anyway, he's an Arsenal supporter so frustration is a general state of mind with him
What we need is someone to step forward and argue there corner on closure, not a throwaway line in a brief message.