Well,
I was happy with Daryl's effort last night
Yes, OK, so I usually am
Is it really useful to be so vituperative about performers you don't like? I'm not mad on Paige, but so what? Spitting the dummy out wouldn't solve anything. And I think I'd be hard pushed to name any performer on this channel (or any channel) who doesn't have a plentiful band of fans.
In terms of Lori, it isn't her being naked and oiled up that make people watch her Rammy, it is an interactive show & viewers like Scottishbloke appreciate that the likes of Lori put on a show whereas the likes of Paige, Daryl while maybe being filthy on the phone don't put on a show.
It's personal choice of course but I would rather watch a girl who puts on a show so I would watch Lori over Paige/Daryl any night of the week.
(29-02-2012 16:06 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]people only reacted because you called paige and daryl shit which is totally wrong and unnacceptable as was saying you want daryl to "fuck off" cause she was "boring the fuck out of me" so basically babestation is only great because lori and camilla go naked and use oil and they have to hog the channels for hours doing the same thing and screw the rest of the babes that you dont like will take a lot more than that to make bs great, they need to ditch the mic girls, ditch the full screen ads and osg's give all the bs babes; not just the ones you like equal screen time
please accept that not everyone likes the same babes as you
(29-02-2012 17:42 )mikedafc Wrote: [ -> ]snip
(29-02-2012 16:06 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]snip
yes i do appreciate that scottishbloke likes the show lori does and the effort lori puts in, but lots of people like & prefer the shows that paige, daryl and the rest of the babestation babes do
but the most important thing about a babestation babe is not the show they do but how good they are on the phone, if theyre not good on a phone, they dont have a job
Rammy just why the fuck could anybody prefer the show's that Daryl and Paige put on compared to Lori, Camilla or Georgie, it's baffling, anybody who thinks this way needs their head read. As has allready been pointed out yeh sure Daryl and Paige might be great on the phone's but as a spectacle they are not in the same league as Lori, Camilla or Georgie and that's what made Babestation totally shit last night. This is not an insult towards any of the models. I'll call it as I see it and the great name of Babestation was dragged down to levels of mediocrity that was contributed to by the total lack of show put on by Daryl and Paige and in particular Daryl as her performance was absolutely dire, I mean FFS she didn't even go topless, fuck that for entertainment, I'd rather see naked, oil and hand thongs any night of the week too
(29-02-2012 17:51 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]yes i do appreciate that scottishbloke likes the show lori does and the effort lori puts in, but lots of people like & prefer the shows that paige, daryl and the rest of the babestation babes do
but the most important thing about a babestation babe is not the show they do but how good they are on the phone, if theyre not good on a phone, they dont have a job
Lori is awesome on the phones btw.
if the main thing that is important is that a girl is good on the phone, then why do they need to be on TV, they might as well be off screen girls in that case. The popular girls in terms of shifts like Lori, Amanda etc to my mind get/got more shifts because casual viewers tune in, see what they are doing on screen & want to find out what they are talking about on the phone and therefore these girls will attract more listeners in to their calls which is where the real money is made.
Yes totally agree with you mikedafc, no point in calling it a show if some models clearly can't perform to this level. At least Georgie and Tiffany are back tonight
so all normalities should be resumed after last night's debacle
(29-02-2012 18:00 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Rammy just why the fuck could anybody prefer the show's that Daryl and Paige put on compared to Lori, Camilla or Georgie, it's baffling, anybody who thinks this way needs their head read. As has allready been pointed out yeh sure Daryl and Paige might be great on the phone's but as a spectacle they are not in the same league as Lori, Camilla or Georgie and that's what made Babestation totally shit last night. This is not an insult towards any of the models. I'll call it as I see it and the great name of Babestation was dragged down to levels of mediocrity that was contributed to by the total lack of show put on by Daryl and Paige and in particular Daryl as her performance was absolutely dire, I mean FFS she didn't even go topless, fuck that for entertainment, I'd rather see naked, oil and hand thongs any night of the week too
I am one of these people who need their "Head read". I personally have never phoned up anyone on babestation, so i can't really comment on that side, but as far as watching goes, in my opinion i would pick Paige and to a lesser extent daryl over just about anybody else, definatly lori as her huge "Porn star boobs" i find quite offputting. Georgie i don't really like, partially because her pierced nipples and her tattoo. Camilla is a whole differenent story. She was really pleasing to look at until, like lori she got "Porn Star" boobs and now is starting to cover her self in tattoos.
As far as just watch babestation i would always have Paige over anybody, ever as she is natural. she does sit, stand, kneel on the bed, moan her head off and swear/dirty talk down the phone all the time, like lori, there is more the her than that.
(29-02-2012 18:00 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Rammy just why the fuck could anybody prefer the show's that Daryl and Paige put on compared to Lori, Camilla or Georgie, it's baffling, anybody who thinks this way needs their head read. As has allready been pointed out yeh sure Daryl and Paige might be great on the phone's but as a spectacle they are not in the same league as Lori, Camilla or Georgie and that's what made Babestation totally shit last night. This is not an insult towards any of the models. I'll call it as I see it and the great name of Babestation was dragged down to levels of mediocrity that was contributed to by the total lack of show put on by Daryl and Paige and in particular Daryl as her performance was absolutely dire, I mean FFS she didn't even go topless, fuck that for entertainment, I'd rather see naked, oil and hand thongs any night of the week too
So now not only are Daryl and Paige shit but all the thousands of fans who actually like them are completely in the wrong and fuckwits to boot. My, what an imaginative and diverse little utopia you demand. No room for anyone else who might differ in their opinion eh!
Channel after channel after channel of naked flesh, covered in oil and if your lucky you might just catch an accidental glimpse of some pussy. God help the day democracy and freedom of choice dies. Why cant you just accept we all have differing tastes. If you don't like then don't watch.
(29-02-2012 18:02 )mikedafc Wrote: [ -> ]if the main thing that is important is that a girl is good on the phone, then why do they need to be on TV, they might as well be off screen girls in that case. The popular girls in terms of shifts like Lori, Amanda etc to my mind get/got more shifts because casual viewers tune in, see what they are doing on screen & want to find out what they are talking about on the phone and therefore these girls will attract more listeners in to their calls which is where the real money is made.
Where is your statistical evidence ie. proof to back up this statement?
Maybe they are the most popular, could not care less, but that is a sweeping assumption unless of course BS confide their phone stats to you.