I don't want to hear moans from sky viewers tonight as they have unleashed on TV with Beth while us freeviewers have to go online or make do with the same one or two girls we get every bloody night.
Tonight might turn out decent after all. We're 15 mins in and Jenna Hoskins & Lucy Summers are both topless, with Dannii Harwood looking to follow suit.
a proper 2 4 1 tonight would be great with tonights line-up doubt we'll see it
After a couple of very poor nights on TS (IMO), Lori's presence tonight should provide some welcome relief (no pun intended!
).
Whether she will be allowed to put on a decent show, however, remains to be seen, particularly as she's on TSX as well.
(30-05-2015 17:47 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]After a couple of very poor nights on TS (IMO), Lori's presence tonight should provide some welcome relief (no pun intended! ).
Whether she will be allowed to put on a decent show, however, remains to be seen, particularly as she's on TSX as well.
While not as good as Wednesday's show, once again, Lori put on a decent show, relatively speaking - looked good, moved around, got into some sexy positions, spreading her legs, showing off her ass etc, and brought her usual enthusiasm to the fore, with an overtly sexual performance, unlike many babes around these days, whose MO seems to be to do as little a possible, while shaking a phone.
The POVCL, unfortunately, though predictably given TSX duties, was the all too common rubbish/deliberately censored camerwork variety, so a waste of time. Additionally, her final section, on BS Blue, was severely compromised by the 'sadine can' approach, with 3 babes on-screen, favoured by S66 & SIN-TV, and now spreading, it would seem. Even here, though, she did what little she could to try and make things interesting.
So, better than the the norm on TS these days, but, of course, it could be soooo much better.
In today's dire climate on the babe channels, we have to be thankful for what modest entertainment can be found, I guess.
Was it my imagination, or was there a significant amount of 'nudity' across TS last night?
If so, a worrying development! Yes, good for those who seem to think 'nudity' is the 'be all and end all', but for those of us who don't find non-explicit, non-hand panty, movement/performance restricting 'nudity' particularly interesting, not good.
Still, at least my favourite babe, Lori, manages to make it a bit less boring than most!
^ Again, it's be careful what you wish (or ask) for in babeshow land. We've already seen how some girls offer the caller's opinions back to us as gospel in justification for their same-y themes. It's quite right that they should listen to the people that are paying. So...
The babe show fan has two choices, if they don't like what they see: They can either boycott what they don't like or phone up and ask for something different next time. Each path has a chance of changing things if you think enough people are going to follow suit. Unfortunately, with the second option you add your number to the dreaded call stats data - something which may, counter productively, carry more weight to the channels than anything you say to the babe.
Take the the former option and you'll likely end up adding your voice in the wilderness like some of us on here.
And there it will stay, until the channels realise that this forum could be harnessed for all the passion it contains for their programming, even beyond the simple advertising that caps and vids provides. And if they cared to looked past the accusations of "whinging" they might find that a lot of what is written on these pages represents lost revenue to them... The list of disenfranchised former customers is growing. Right now BS (or any channel) could reclaim a significant bunch of these with the right moves; much longer and that money will be lost for good.