03-05-2018, 00:48
(30-04-2018 19:17 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ](30-04-2018 15:03 )Davy Crockett Wrote: [ -> ](30-04-2018 12:21 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]how can booking girls not to get there boobs out be smart and good for them in the long run
All the shows could be like that in the long run.
A future vision of the babeshows where every single ounce of flesh is monitised may seem enticing to some insiders, and even some regular punters with delusions of being some kind of 'special' contributer, but anyone thinking like that needs to ask themselves this: How many punters do you imagine can afford to, and do, interact with the channels on every single occassion that they tune-in? The number must be incredibly small.
I'd suggest that there has to be some visual value in the shows as 'shows' in order to retain a general audience such that there is a large enough viewership to bring enough occassional payers back even at times when they are not paying. Only then will the percentage of payers in the audience each night remain high enough to keep the shows going. I feel for most guys watching the nightshows that's going to mean some nipple on show at the least.
I completely agree shandy. This almost no pay no play mantra certainly BS are heading towards is essentially only sustainable for about 10% maybe even less of the caller/watcher base. Certainly if you have a number of favourites. Maybe doable if your are able to singularly focused on 1 babe. The “free” element needs to be there and decently enough to both attract and retain watchers who might call in if and when they fancy it. This almost sole reliance on “regulars” is a dodgy ground.