28-08-2016, 22:05
(28-08-2016 06:21 )trains55 Wrote: [ -> ](28-08-2016 00:46 )jimmyt73 Wrote: [ -> ](28-08-2016 00:34 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]Correct me if im wrong but although OFCOM may not be fully responsible,it was them who banned 241s with actual contact in 2012,so this was why i expressed my opinion on the need for more than four babes a night under current restrictions,some by the regulator and equally bs must share the blame as well.(28-08-2016 00:22 )jimmyt73 Wrote: [ -> ](28-08-2016 00:08 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]now it's triple babe time on 909!!!!! 5 babes for 3 channels is too manyQuite agree,during the Dutch regulated period there were many occasions when having five or more babes would have been ideal,but under current OFCOM regs all it seems to do is censor how far one babe can due to another,or tonight 2 others being present,in summary two or more babes who can interact was a good idea but putting three together under current restrictions is madness,particularly when two of them have put stronger solo stints on for some time.
I would be very surprised if the extreme tameness, and the other shit that's wrong with the channels these days, is anything to do with 'Ofcon'.
BUT recently especially last night there has been bodily contact occasionally BUT not overtly sexually! SO is it bS and not OFCON! It looks that way to me! WHY?
It's because they make the FTA 'shows' as tame as possible, in an attempt to encourage as many people as possible to go for the 'paid upfront' content (BS Xtra, pervcam etc.) to get the 'good stuff', while using 'Ofcon' as a convenient scapegoat.
At least, that's my guess.