09-07-2016, 23:18
(09-07-2016 22:36 )M-L-L Wrote: [ -> ]From the point of view of the TV viewer, if you like seeing the babes sitting still and filmed only from the waist up, and maybe with glimpses of their knees close to the camera in the bottom of the frame just for extra spice, then its quids in.
For the rest of us non-cam users, it's a catastrophe.
So it's the same case in BS too? I am not an avid viewer of this channel but I expected BS to at least put a bit more effort to it than st66, who I've thought to be the lazier channel of the 2.
I support the idea of perve cams since I love watching these girls being secretly naughty behind the TV screen. But the top-half-only (or in extreme cases, face-only) shots are a huge turnoff for me since it damages the secretive factor & usually the best parts of the girl are hidden from the TV angle. It has lazy performing & camera work written all over it & is down-right disrespectful for the TV audience. I've seen shows with perve cams that can be hugely stimulating from both POV's. But it usually involves the more professional girls & staff, who actually put some effort into selling their services rather than making themselves feel as comfortable as possible. Can't imagine it's very beneficial money-wise as well, since there are A LOT of foot worshippers out there.