(02-02-2022 16:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote: [ -> ] (30-01-2022 00:13 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.
I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude. Unless you're going to frequently pay lots of money to watch on a 'perv cam', you'll be deprived the glorious sight of Maria Smith, Michelle Moist and many others lying back on the bed with their legs spread wide apart teasing their fingers around their crotch. Of course they're wearing tiny panties (even doubled up sometimes), but for me that's a much better sight than the totally naked girls on Babestation, where the camera rarely shows all their body or they're partly hidden by the onscreen graphics.
Perhaps because I like the sight of a woman clad in sexy lingerie far more than a woman totally nude (I still get off on the tease and suggestion) it might make my argument a bit biased. But I think we still see far more of the girls bodies on Xpanded than on Babestation. And you only have to see how that channel is currently faring now it's pretty much all cam shows.
And of course who's to say if all the girls want to go fully nude anyway? Michelle, Vicki and Kendall would probably have no issue, but what about the other girls?
Totally agree Harry. I find it so boring when girls go straight to nudity in a few seconds & then just lie there for hours on end. I'm still a big fan of Only Tease & love to see similar on the TV. The tease element + a slow strip to partial nudity is far more arousing IMO. This is made all the better when sheer nylons are involved, particularly FF seams and tights. Michelle, Vicky and Maria particularly do this best so that's what puts Xpanded way ahead of the other 2 lame channels. Lets hope Xpanded continue to deliver and don't start messing about like the other 2. Also it's great to see Jennifer Kelly back on XP- let's hope there's a Night show soon.
(02-02-2022 22:32 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ] (02-02-2022 21:55 )Norman Beige Wrote: [ -> ] (02-02-2022 16:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote: [ -> ] (30-01-2022 00:13 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.
I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude. Unless you're going to frequently pay lots of money to watch on a 'perv cam', you'll be deprived the glorious sight of Maria Smith, Michelle Moist and many others lying back on the bed with their legs spread wide apart teasing their fingers around their crotch. Of course they're wearing tiny panties (even doubled up sometimes), but for me that's a much better sight than the totally naked girls on Babestation, where the camera rarely shows all their body or they're partly hidden by the onscreen graphics.
Perhaps because I like the sight of a woman clad in sexy lingerie far more than a woman totally nude (I still get off on the tease and suggestion) it might make my argument a bit biased. But I think we still see far more of the girls bodies on Xpanded than on Babestation. And you only have to see how that channel is currently faring now it's pretty much all cam shows.
And of course who's to say if all the girls want to go fully nude anyway? Michelle, Vicki and Kendall would probably have no issue, but what about the other girls?
Here here, the gospel according to xpanded. 
Sadly. Xpanded has so much potential, if only the producers would allow the same rules as Babestation, it would be a great channel and a proper night channel. At the moment it's a complete waste of potential and talent.
Just can't agree with that! Why naked is seen as the primary (or in too many cases - only) benchmark for a successful channel/show beats the hell out of me! I completely agree with Harry and BlueMoon. I don't usually do this. but we are told there are 'real performers' elsewhere from Xpanded. They really do not expend any more energy than at Xpanded (for much less effect) and it seems therefore, that getting naked is the only thing that some are using as an example of them being 'great performers'. Lost on me I have to say - and thankfully to read through the comments - others as well
(02-02-2022 17:56 )Carl-Gen X Wrote: [ -> ]Good to see that it’s not just me who prefers to see them wear a little and are therefore able to adopt a number of titillating positions as opposed to being nude and spending all their time lying on their front. It was this that put me off watching BS, I very quickly got bored with seeing them lying on their front constantly. Might as well have been watching mannequins which had the ability to waggle phones in the air at regular intervals!
Exactly!! And what is the point, if they get cropped to within an inch of their lives upon getting naked, if that is so much a thing??
Ashton Rae is often the babe of the night when she's on the nightshow & she doesn't go naked (on tv)......case closed
(03-02-2022 01:42 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ] (02-02-2022 23:03 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ] (02-02-2022 16:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote: [ -> ] (30-01-2022 00:13 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.
I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude.
To give Mr Mann his due, he says this about every channel 
I say this about Babestation? Can you point to a post of mine where I yearn for the women to finally go nude on Babestation? More nude POVs would be nice, and more nude standing sessions, but I don't think your comment is correct, since Babestation allows the women to go nude.
Xpanded sadly does not allow full nudity. It could be a great channel, but at the moment it's tamesville 24/7.
Yeah "standing nude sessions" is the sort of thing that I was thinking of. It's your catchphrase
(03-02-2022 01:42 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ] (02-02-2022 23:03 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ] (02-02-2022 16:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote: [ -> ] (30-01-2022 00:13 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.
I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude.
To give Mr Mann his due, he says this about every channel
I say this about Babestation? Can you point to a post of mine where I yearn for the women to finally go nude on Babestation? More nude POVs would be nice, and more nude standing sessions, but I don't think your comment is correct, since Babestation allows the women to go nude.
Xpanded sadly does not allow full nudity. It could be a great channel, but at the moment it's tamesville 24/7.
Maybe it’s just me but I can’t imagine anything more tame than the girls lying flat on their stomachs waggling their phones in the air at regular intervals. The very fact that them being nude restricts them to lying on their stomachs is more than likely the reason they’re having to waggle their phones in the air all the time!!
(03-02-2022 07:10 )bluemoon99 Wrote: [ -> ] (02-02-2022 16:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote: [ -> ] (30-01-2022 00:13 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.
I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude. Unless you're going to frequently pay lots of money to watch on a 'perv cam', you'll be deprived the glorious sight of Maria Smith, Michelle Moist and many others lying back on the bed with their legs spread wide apart teasing their fingers around their crotch. Of course they're wearing tiny panties (even doubled up sometimes), but for me that's a much better sight than the totally naked girls on Babestation, where the camera rarely shows all their body or they're partly hidden by the onscreen graphics.
Perhaps because I like the sight of a woman clad in sexy lingerie far more than a woman totally nude (I still get off on the tease and suggestion) it might make my argument a bit biased. But I think we still see far more of the girls bodies on Xpanded than on Babestation. And you only have to see how that channel is currently faring now it's pretty much all cam shows.
And of course who's to say if all the girls want to go fully nude anyway? Michelle, Vicki and Kendall would probably have no issue, but what about the other girls?
Totally agree Harry. I find it so boring when girls go straight to nudity in a few seconds & then just lie there for hours on end. I'm still a big fan of Only Tease & love to see similar on the TV. The tease element + a slow strip to partial nudity is far more arousing IMO. This is made all the better when sheer nylons are involved, particularly FF seams and tights. Michelle, Vicky and Maria particularly do this best so that's what puts Xpanded way ahead of the other 2 lame channels. Lets hope Xpanded continue to deliver and don't start messing about like the other 2. Also it's great to see Jennifer Kelly back on XP- let's hope there's a Night show soon.
I find it boring too when the women go straight to nudity. However, it's a shame that the producers won't allow any full nudity at all on this channel when Babestation allows it often. Such a waste.
(03-02-2022 18:02 )Carl-Gen X Wrote: [ -> ] (03-02-2022 01:42 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ] (02-02-2022 23:03 )Doddle Wrote: [ -> ] (02-02-2022 16:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote: [ -> ] (30-01-2022 00:13 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.
I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude.
To give Mr Mann his due, he says this about every channel
I say this about Babestation? Can you point to a post of mine where I yearn for the women to finally go nude on Babestation? More nude POVs would be nice, and more nude standing sessions, but I don't think your comment is correct, since Babestation allows the women to go nude.
Xpanded sadly does not allow full nudity. It could be a great channel, but at the moment it's tamesville 24/7.
Maybe it’s just me but I can’t imagine anything more tame than the girls lying flat on their stomachs waggling their phones in the air at regular intervals. The very fact that them being nude restricts them to lying on their stomachs is more than likely the reason they’re having to waggle their phones in the air all the time!!
Do the women who go nude at Babestation have to sit on their stomachs all the time? No, they don't, so then why can't the producers at Xpanded allow the women to go nude as well?????
Xpanded could be an incredible babe channel, but at the moment it's not very good.
There Daytime is dire. Absolute waste of time.
(03-02-2022 21:31 )Zai47 Wrote: [ -> ]There Daytime is dire. Absolute waste of time.
& what has that opinion got to do with a post in a Night Show thread.
