(18-11-2015 20:13 )cmiller Wrote: [ -> ] (17-11-2015 23:57 )Broncobilly Wrote: [ -> ]They should stick to solo shows as they are scared to let anything happen and try to block the screen at the first hint of team work
i'll never get over the girls not being able to do as much as tv shows on the main channels. i remember Camillla making a joke about viewers "playing with yourselves", then making a grovelling apology; that was the beginning of the end for me
Funny how the shows took themselves down with all the childish name calling and trying to get each other shut down and now we are left with good solo shows or pointless duo shows
^^^ i think that's because of the types of guys that run the shows: "yeah, let's create a show where lots of girls have to get their tits out!!"
they probably aren't smart enough to see the bigger picture, unless they were hoping to win purely by being the last channel standing. 100% of nothing and all that.....
^The producers sadly only think of getting to 5.30am and nothing interesting happened between the girls which makes it a loss for everyone the girls can't relax and we are left knowing the shows should be better
i won't pretend that it's easy for them with Ofcom classifying it as teleshopping, but if they worked together and got organised they definitely would have achieved something by now. Bluebird tried to fight it but a lack of leadership across the channels has prevented them from being 'all they can be'
(18-11-2015 21:38 )cmiller Wrote: [ -> ]i won't pretend that it's easy for them with Ofcom classifying it as teleshopping, but if they worked together and got organised they definitely would have achieved something by now. Bluebird tried to fight it but a lack of leadership across the channels has prevented them from being 'all they can be'
I think the problem started with the channels turning on each other as one probably thought it was easier to cause trouble than compete
they're only as strong as their weakest link. there's strength in numbers. someone should tell them that.
(18-11-2015 21:52 )cmiller Wrote: [ -> ]they're only as strong as their weakest link. there's strength in numbers. someone should tell them that.
I think they never grasped that concept or maybe always thought the market would remain.? It's just such a pity the way the shows are now the channels have good rosters but very little ambition.
They did not need to have it this way with OfCom telling them how it goes they created there own eventual demise
(18-11-2015 20:10 )Joey 27 Wrote: [ -> ] (18-11-2015 16:56 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]looking at the 2 newbies last night was struck by how much this channel has changed its identity this year,
12 months back it was the home of the smaller boobed natural looking girls, with i always liked as it was different to what the other channels do,
now its gone all plastic its just become one of the crowed which i can't see as a good thing for them,
And its "plastic" girls like Sophie Hart and Yasmine James who made it on the bigger channels, im not sure why anyone would use the word "plastic" when they are a fan of Candy Charms anyway
Why not use the word plastic I don't use it in a bad way as u say they are plenty of plastic girls I really like, I simply use it as a girl is ever plastic or natural this is just a fact,
The point I was making was that this channel was the place of people bwho liked natural girls more, now it is not so for me that's a gap in the market,
On a side note I will have to check some old caps but think Yasmine was natural when she was on Xpanded
Another night and another missed opportunity to put Dionne and Tori together. This channel just won't give us something new grrrr
It doesn't really matter who goes with who as double babe stints are boring anyway, if two girls you like are sharing a set then its a bit better but not by much