16-04-2016, 14:54
^ I took joey's comments to be refering to a girl's past history of call stats at the channel rather than specifically those for that night. This is the only way scheduling could be planned in advance as I think has been established as standard practice for the channels. (I assume scheduling would only be created 'on the fly' in the event that the girl in question was having a particularly bad night.)
But as in all things concerning the babeshows I think it is a mistake to try and look for hard and fast rules on these things as if they could be decided by computer. IMO we can look for patterns and evidence of the criteria involved in such decisions (I do this more than most on here would care for I'd guess) but we should bear in mind at all times that there are humans involved in all these things. Where that's the case there are always going to be some variation from regular practice and methodology on occasion.
Psedo-computerised decisions would be best avoided in any case for the sheer sake of variety and to avoid the possible effects of stagnation.
But as in all things concerning the babeshows I think it is a mistake to try and look for hard and fast rules on these things as if they could be decided by computer. IMO we can look for patterns and evidence of the criteria involved in such decisions (I do this more than most on here would care for I'd guess) but we should bear in mind at all times that there are humans involved in all these things. Where that's the case there are always going to be some variation from regular practice and methodology on occasion.
Psedo-computerised decisions would be best avoided in any case for the sheer sake of variety and to avoid the possible effects of stagnation.