(12-01-2015 21:38 )FormallyInfernal Wrote: [ -> ]I'm not sure if this is the real deal or not: a profile for Michelle Moist was taking calls a few minutes ago. It's set up for cams as well, but her Twitter account is only directing you to the likes of AdultWork and a verified phone service at distinctly higher rates than xxXpanded's!
http://www.xxxpanded.com/livechat/michellemoist
If it is real, I just remember Louise Kay ruling out working here because they wouldn't entertain the prospect of dual camming.
that section has also included at various times profiles using the names madison ivy, christy mack and sunny leone. Another of the profiles 'leeza' uses photos of sandra shine - bizarrely comments say 'love your photos' etc raising the question of whether these people are too stupid to realise that they are not of the person to whom they may be talking. Another prominent profile is accompanied by photos of american pornstar amber michaels.
(13-01-2015 08:36 )m100 Wrote: [ -> ]that section has also included at various times profiles using the names madison ivy, christy mack and sunny leone. Another of the profiles 'leeza' uses photos of sandra shine - bizarrely comments say 'love your photos' etc raising the question of whether these people are too stupid to realise that they are not of the person to whom they may be talking. Another prominent profile is accompanied by photos of american pornstar amber michaels.
Won't be the first time it's happened, and cannot be the last.. To be fair to the lady behind the ringer, 'Leeza' has been there for years and her regulars will be appreciating more than just Sandra Shine's good looks, but it'll be galling to the ladies who do agonise over the decision to submit personal and explicit pics.
Meanwhile, I've used my last few credits for now in some selfless research.
It sounded like it could be Michelle, and on connecting to her for about four minutes I came away with a bit of faith in this online presence. She remembered a described session with Leah Jaye, and was mulling over when she might try the webcam out. Blind faith for now; of course I'll say I knew all along if a familiar moving face should manifest itself!
(14-01-2015 04:00 )masterjboy Wrote: [ -> ]Now that alicia is back she looks really miserable
And here was me thinking that she was really making an effort to smile more.
p.s. Why are you watching her face
An update, as the webcamming has started. I could only top up from my phone and that only had enough for £5 (so only 2 minutes). I still could end up, as Kenneth Williams used to say, with
omelette sur le visage, but it looks like Michelle to me, and she was fantabulosa in that short time!
When Alicia was on the other night was laughing a lot, didn't look miserable at all. Maybe the producer she used to argue with has left.
What a great line up on xpanded last night! The best on all the channels by a mile!
So, I thought I'd try recording their FV show. 5 1/2 hours is a bit of a drag, but with rotation, should be kept interesting.
Except rotation runs to the same 2-3 babes, rather than all the babes in the studio
It's nice to see Lenni and Lily, or Hazel and Lily, but not so hot if you want to catch Alicia
Presumably this is one more reason that we don't get allowed caps; because then we'd be wondering whether that cream sheet ever gets changed. Or whether that background really is influenced by Mondrian
If the girl you want to see is not on freeview when it comes on at midnight, I find that quite often ,after various combinations of the same three on the bed, there is a swap of one of them at 2am with a girl who was on one of the other channels.
To add a bit of incentive, I have a theory that the girl with the lowest call stats in the first two hours is the one who gets the boot. Which is why it never seems to be Honey.
I noticed Lacey was on from Midnight to about half 1 the other night, without much "Imma waggling my phone because it's quiet" antics, either, but then she was gone.
Never seem to see an OSG saying who's on the other beds/channels, though there's usually the odd "so & so is on cams/at home" thing.
Could be worse, I guess
