(20-05-2019 12:10 )SecretAgent Wrote: [ -> ]^^I don’t see anybody defending xpanded. That’s not the point and you are deliberately mixing the 2 issues. Carl was not elected to represent forum members but chose to make out that he was. He was actually told not to do that but did so anyway.
I have not authorised anyone on here to speak on my behalf but if such an agreement was reached it would be with my full knowledge of the actual wording being used and I would expect to properly sign up to it. I don’t need keyboard vigilantes claiming to represent me!
To be clear this is distinct from my total disgust at what it seems has happened at xpanded.
Thank you SecretAgent. I appreciate your most worthy post, which represents my own views entirely.
Odd, for the first this year only ONE XPANDED channel being used showing the lovely Ms Moist yet Sapphire and Ashton were also supposed to be on-unless for some reason they willl appear later-knock on effect maybe?
Big changes?
Chocolate Hobnobs instead of Digestives in the tea Room?
TMI Rammy TMI
Well Michelle is doing a great job tonight.
I wonder what changes-different sets? new girls? roaming cams(not perv) and gulp! maybe actual NUDITY??
I find it odd, that a company business model like Xpanded's feels there is no need for them to have a HR department which to me sounds like a decision that this Ken took early on, so that he would not be the subject of any internal investigation if there was one. Personally, I would feel bad for the babes there, when I say this, but I would feel happier if Xpanded's licence was temporarily revoked and station closed for further investigation and the licence was restored to new owners who can perhaps be a bit more respectful to their presenters.
(22-05-2019 01:08 )GreenMachine Wrote: [ -> ]I wonder what changes-different sets? new girls? roaming cams(not perv) and gulp! maybe actual NUDITY??
How about them lifting the ban on the capping - that's an
INJUSTICE On
OUR Part and like I said before, it feels like a piece of the jigsaw is missing where caps from XP are concerned, and doesn't feel like the
complete picture of the babe shows is being properly reflected on the forum without them.
(22-05-2019 07:08 )babelover48 Wrote: [ -> ]How about them lifting the ban on the capping - that's an INJUSTICE On OUR Part and like I said before, it feels like a piece of the jigsaw is missing where caps from XP are concerned, and doesn't feel like the complete picture of the babe shows is being properly reflected on the forum without them.
I’m no fan of Xpanded but seriously you think the capping ban is an injustice? Do you understand copyright law? Have you ever heard if it?
They are entirely within their rights even if from a promotional perspective it’s a stupid decision in this marketplace.