The UK Babe Channels Forum

Going to miss you mate, you were one of three people who instantly got me and knew what I was about. Take care now my friend.

(19-05-2019 18:35 )gunnar Wrote: [ -> ]^ Why does he specifically have to mention their names?

Because if he doesn't know their names, why should anyone believe that he's speaking on their behalf.

To speak on someone's behalf you should have their permission to do so and their agreement to have their name used.

I could claim that I'm writing this post on behalf of others. If I can't say who they are, why should you believe me?

When speaking on behalf of others, the proper thing to do is to add their names at the bottom of the message.

(19-05-2019 18:43 )terence Wrote: [ -> ]^what you posted is fine. it's nobody else business.

Yeah because he deleted the original one didn't he? Which claimed to be written on behalf of the forum.

Since I'm a member of this forum it actually is my business.

In his original message he said he represented ALL the members of the UK Babe Channels Forum (my capitals).

He doesn't represent me and shouldn't be doing anything in my name. I had every right to protest about it.

I see the houlier than thou brigade are out at their divisive best on this one. Only they could stir over such a subject.

(19-05-2019 19:09 )tony confederate Wrote: [ -> ]Because if he doesn't know their names, why should anyone believe that he's speaking on their behalf.

To speak on someone's behalf you should have their permission to do so and their agreement to have their name used.

I could claim that I'm writing this post on behalf of others. If I can't say who they are, why should you believe me?

When speaking on behalf of others, the proper thing to do is to add their names at the bottom of the message.

^ That's just a little precious don't you think? Carl had the clear support of certain members here who had expressed accord with what he was doing, as he was doing it via this thread, so "others" is perfectly valid, in the circumstances, without further explanation. So what if it took him a revision to get that element right. I dare say you lot are perfect?!

More interesting I feel is the underlying notion of why you are trying to deny the voice that Carl has expressed...

I have a question for rygel, tony, barracuda and/or marlowe: If you claim Carl is not speaking for you then what do you actually think about this Ken situation? If your opinion is contary to Carl's why hide its nature? If it's not contary, how was he not representing your feelings exactly?

My opinion is, firstly, that I have no wish to do anything in relation to this matter unless it was with the express agreement and approval of the girls concerned.

And secondly, anything I chose to do I would do myself in my own name, without anyone speaking for me. If I needed someone to represent me I would ask.

^ Would that not have been a better way to express it several posts back?

Can't some of these girls just go and work at S66. God knows they need them.

(19-05-2019 19:13 )dominar rygel xvi Wrote: [ -> ]

(19-05-2019 18:43 )terence Wrote: [ -> ]^what you posted is fine. it's nobody else business.

Yeah because he deleted the original one didn't he? Which claimed to be written on behalf of the forum.

Since I'm a member of this forum it actually is my business.

as he didn't post on the forums behalf, as skully requested, it's got fuck all to do with anyone but him and xpanded.

and nobody deleted shit. cheers.

^And to those who sniped at him for doing it, your attitude was one of petulance and i think he has now gone and left the forum.
I still haven't seen the actual post he made or what he wrote, but I think if we did it as an individual thing without having to mention the forum, then we can express our concern at the situation that has arisen.

Bullying is NOT ACCEPTABLE IN ANY WORKING or SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT. Trust me, I Have Had my share of it over the years and it is NOT NICE.