(31-07-2014 00:17 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: [ -> ]Uh-oh, they've started on the slippery slope of sticking graphics boxes up the side of the screen now, with an ad for the webcam girls.
With three girls on the bed, it is bound to get in the way.
Just because all the other channels do it is no reason to copy them.
maybe extra graphics and folk talking about the weather aren't the only avenues they are following babestation down. in true bsx fashion they've been and still are advertising lenni as appearing on tv tonight. so far she's nowhere to be seen. the slippery slope may be turning into a full on toboggan-fest.
m100, you just beat me to it.
I nearly choked on my supper when i looked up the xpanded website and saw Lenni on the schedule.
But she isn't, is she
It's just the "girls @ home" thing.
Not impressed.
still advertising both lenni and candy as appearing 11pm-2am on alternate days over the next few. while most of us may realise that means on cam girls at home then others may be patiently waiting in front of the tv/pc for either to turn up. clearly xpanded don't appreciate that if you're under the impression you will be able to see and speak to these girls you probably won't be calling the others first so they are losing potential callers.
i think as a channel it's pretty much at a crossroads, turn right and get some new sets, 2-4-1's, better picture quality etc and take on the other channels or turn left and go down the not to be trusted, graphics laden, boredom of their rivals which is sad because they must have had babestation shitting itself for twelve months.
First post, so apologies if this is the wrong place or if I'm not following posting etiquette!
Technical question about Studiocam though. The advert for studiocam on the channel says £3 for the night, texting CAM to 89863. On the website, it says to text STUDIO and another word (randomly generated) for £5. Is there a difference in the service depending on which you pay for?
Also, paying via text will still allow studiiocam to be viewed via a laptop, for example, won't it? Or is it only via a smartphone?
Grateful for any help!
Roy.
From what I have read on the Xpanded site, the £5 option is for using the service via the website (where you can also pay using webcam credits), and the £3 option is for iphones & tablets.
I haven't tried it myself but the instructions say to make sure you are logged onto the website if paying the £5 by text, so I would presume that means you will get it on your laptop.
Thanks for that. Hoped it wasn't the case that I'd have to shell out more for it, but looks likely. Managed to get a 2 minute freebie signing up a phone number to the site though. Maybe I'm just a bit tight with money, but just not sure if it's worth a crisp fiver. Seems like half decent reviews though, so I'm torn...
Thanks again.
Lily Rose and Goldie on the same bed. My stomach and lap are about to get very sticky. Very sticky indeed.
There's been identical output on two of the three channels tonight. Only three girls to cover 3 channels, babes must have more important things to be doing on a bank holiday weekend. So it's a choice between Sammie & Sammie, and then the other Sammie.
i find i am losing interest in this channel of late, it still has lots of girls i like and they all still put in great shows but i have seen it all before, the lack of any variety in set and camera work is just stopping this channel moving forward, would it be so hard to make a small office set for one of the channels it would make such a difference if the girls could stand up on one of the channels
(25-08-2014 00:58 )circles_o_o_o Wrote: [ -> ]There's been identical output on two of the three channels tonight. Only three girls to cover 3 channels, babes must have more important things to be doing on a bank holiday weekend. So it's a choice between Sammie & Sammie, and then the other Sammie.
they seemed to have the same problem last night when i looked at 10.30pm with honey on two channels and it looks from their schedule as if they've only got three girls in tonight. Given the number of girls they seem to have it's a bit poor. i don't think they have any intention of even going as far as letting the girls stand let alone different sets - it seems like the aldi/lidl approach to a babechannel get em in, get em on and get em off cheap. it's hard to argue with it but with the likes of isabella, honey, lenni, candy etc they could have most of the other channels crying into their beer on a nightly basis if they actually put as much effort into their channel as some of the girls do.