Xpanded tv - General Chat & Discussion

(31-01-2022 21:51 )pvam1 Wrote:  The reason we don't see much of the newish girls is that its clear Vicky, Honey, Michelle, Ashton and Maria have agreements to do 2 nights a week which only leaves 4 slots for Georgie, Lola, Kendall, Abigaile, Hazel, Roxy, Ellise, Becky, Natasha, Jessy and Alotta.

And then there's day girls who never get a night slot like Tia, Cookie, Jenna, Dakota, Clara, Poppi, Louise, Rae Rae and Hannah fair enough if some don't want to do night but some might and there is very little opportunity.

Not sure what they can do about it but that does seem to be the issue.

Create different agreements/contracts or whatever?? I suspect you are right in surmising that Tia, Jenna etc don't want to do nights! Shame, but that is just the way it is I guess! I often wonder whether cams is so different to nights, and why they prefer that?? Just curious .....no more than that

(02-02-2022 16:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(30-01-2022 00:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude. Unless you're going to frequently pay lots of money to watch on a 'perv cam', you'll be deprived the glorious sight of Maria Smith, Michelle Moist and many others lying back on the bed with their legs spread wide apart teasing their fingers around their crotch. Of course they're wearing tiny panties (even doubled up sometimes), but for me that's a much better sight than the totally naked girls on Babestation, where the camera rarely shows all their body or they're partly hidden by the onscreen graphics.

Perhaps because I like the sight of a woman clad in sexy lingerie far more than a woman totally nude (I still get off on the tease and suggestion) it might make my argument a bit biased. But I think we still see far more of the girls bodies on Xpanded than on Babestation. And you only have to see how that channel is currently faring now it's pretty much all cam shows.

And of course who's to say if all the girls want to go fully nude anyway? Michelle, Vicki and Kendall would probably have no issue, but what about the other girls?

I find myself in full agreement with everything you state here!

Good to see that it’s not just me who prefers to see them wear a little and are therefore able to adopt a number of titillating positions as opposed to being nude and spending all their time lying on their front. It was this that put me off watching BS, I very quickly got bored with seeing them lying on their front constantly. Might as well have been watching mannequins which had the ability to waggle phones in the air at regular intervals!

Jennifer, Kendall (Amy rose) and Lola would be awesome

(02-02-2022 16:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(30-01-2022 00:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude. Unless you're going to frequently pay lots of money to watch on a 'perv cam', you'll be deprived the glorious sight of Maria Smith, Michelle Moist and many others lying back on the bed with their legs spread wide apart teasing their fingers around their crotch. Of course they're wearing tiny panties (even doubled up sometimes), but for me that's a much better sight than the totally naked girls on Babestation, where the camera rarely shows all their body or they're partly hidden by the onscreen graphics.

Perhaps because I like the sight of a woman clad in sexy lingerie far more than a woman totally nude (I still get off on the tease and suggestion) it might make my argument a bit biased. But I think we still see far more of the girls bodies on Xpanded than on Babestation. And you only have to see how that channel is currently faring now it's pretty much all cam shows.

And of course who's to say if all the girls want to go fully nude anyway? Michelle, Vicki and Kendall would probably have no issue, but what about the other girls?

This

(02-02-2022 16:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(30-01-2022 00:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude. Unless you're going to frequently pay lots of money to watch on a 'perv cam', you'll be deprived the glorious sight of Maria Smith, Michelle Moist and many others lying back on the bed with their legs spread wide apart teasing their fingers around their crotch. Of course they're wearing tiny panties (even doubled up sometimes), but for me that's a much better sight than the totally naked girls on Babestation, where the camera rarely shows all their body or they're partly hidden by the onscreen graphics.

Perhaps because I like the sight of a woman clad in sexy lingerie far more than a woman totally nude (I still get off on the tease and suggestion) it might make my argument a bit biased. But I think we still see far more of the girls bodies on Xpanded than on Babestation. And you only have to see how that channel is currently faring now it's pretty much all cam shows.

And of course who's to say if all the girls want to go fully nude anyway? Michelle, Vicki and Kendall would probably have no issue, but what about the other girls?

I can't imagine why someone would want to see nude women on a babe channel

If the producers allowed similar sessions to Babestation, then it would be great to see some of the best Xpanded women allowed to do some nude sessions for once. With Studio 66 being mostly horrible, and Babestation ranging from good, decent and shite, having another channel that allows nudity would be refreshing, and would offer just enough extra to view.

(02-02-2022 16:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(30-01-2022 00:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude. Unless you're going to frequently pay lots of money to watch on a 'perv cam', you'll be deprived the glorious sight of Maria Smith, Michelle Moist and many others lying back on the bed with their legs spread wide apart teasing their fingers around their crotch. Of course they're wearing tiny panties (even doubled up sometimes), but for me that's a much better sight than the totally naked girls on Babestation, where the camera rarely shows all their body or they're partly hidden by the onscreen graphics.

Perhaps because I like the sight of a woman clad in sexy lingerie far more than a woman totally nude (I still get off on the tease and suggestion) it might make my argument a bit biased. But I think we still see far more of the girls bodies on Xpanded than on Babestation. And you only have to see how that channel is currently faring now it's pretty much all cam shows.

And of course who's to say if all the girls want to go fully nude anyway? Michelle, Vicki and Kendall would probably have no issue, but what about the other girls?

Here here, the gospel according to xpanded.

(02-02-2022 21:55 )Norman Beige Wrote:  

(02-02-2022 16:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(30-01-2022 00:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude. Unless you're going to frequently pay lots of money to watch on a 'perv cam', you'll be deprived the glorious sight of Maria Smith, Michelle Moist and many others lying back on the bed with their legs spread wide apart teasing their fingers around their crotch. Of course they're wearing tiny panties (even doubled up sometimes), but for me that's a much better sight than the totally naked girls on Babestation, where the camera rarely shows all their body or they're partly hidden by the onscreen graphics.

Perhaps because I like the sight of a woman clad in sexy lingerie far more than a woman totally nude (I still get off on the tease and suggestion) it might make my argument a bit biased. But I think we still see far more of the girls bodies on Xpanded than on Babestation. And you only have to see how that channel is currently faring now it's pretty much all cam shows.

And of course who's to say if all the girls want to go fully nude anyway? Michelle, Vicki and Kendall would probably have no issue, but what about the other girls?

Here here, the gospel according to xpanded.

Sadly. Xpanded has so much potential, if only the producers would allow the same rules as Babestation, it would be a great channel and a proper night channel. At the moment it's a complete waste of potential and talent.

(02-02-2022 16:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(30-01-2022 00:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude.

To give Mr Mann his due, he says this about every channel

(02-02-2022 23:03 )Doddle Wrote:  

(02-02-2022 16:07 )Harry_da_Monk Wrote:  

(30-01-2022 00:13 )mrmann Wrote:  Gotta hand it to Xpanded last night. They had the best camera angles and use of the sets. Now if only the producers would allow the women to go nude.

I just don't get this constant yearning for the Xpanded girls to go nude.

To give Mr Mann his due, he says this about every channel

I say this about Babestation? Can you point to a post of mine where I yearn for the women to finally go nude on Babestation? More nude POVs would be nice, and more nude standing sessions, but I don't think your comment is correct, since Babestation allows the women to go nude.

Xpanded sadly does not allow full nudity. It could be a great channel, but at the moment it's tamesville 24/7.