(24-10-2011 03:36 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]Addison I think you'll find your opinions are in the minority
So if it could be proved to you in a way that you'd accept that your opinions were in the minority, you'd stop agitating for more explicit shows?
(24-10-2011 03:36 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]the reason myself and the other 321 including Stan who signed the petition is because we do give a fuck about the babe channels contrary to your stance on it. Fanboys such as yourself are easily pleased
I give a fuck! I give a fuck about the quality of what we're currently getting. Also, it's pretty funny to be called a fanboy by a guy who's got banners like "Bailey Cream - The No 1 Queen Of Sport" and "Lucy Summers - RLC'S Finest" displayed prominently as his sig. (Wonder how long that'll remain!).
(24-10-2011 03:36 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]for all the softcore shows that currently exist that Ofcom could and can revoke their licence at any moment and when that becomes the case you too will be asking yourself why you never signed the petition.
When and if the babe shows all fold, I'll say they were good while they lasted and go and watch the QVC beauty and exercise channels instead ("Darn it! He even enjoys sun-cream being massaged into models arms and legs, and ladies doing pilates routines in leotards! It's not fair!").
If a difference can be made by doing something worthwhile then i'm all for it; but this thread is nothin more than a discussion between indivduals on something no one on here has no power to change and neva will.
OBVIOUSLY ofcom is reading this and saying there are some great points being made on here we should all pay attention to whats being said NOT.............. If so much indivduals care so much about the babeshows keep funding it by calling and buying pics and vids and stop complaining.
It's a well argued point from Addison and makes you think. It is almost impossible to get things just right where everyone would be satisfied.
Frustratingly, looking back it seems about a year or two ago had content most of us would be happy with. (Also for yourself Addison?) Now it seems a longshot to get back there. This petition looks like it wants a review of ofcom by the government but it's so unlikely they would come out with 'ah yes we want to roll back the guidelines a few years, and allow 2-4-1 contact, full nudity, but no actual sex.'
Good point about slagging off 'fanboys' as well. There really is no reason to attack non signers as fanboys as I bet folks who champion particular girls also often have good reason to sign.
As we can see with the current discussion on the country's future as a part of Europe a successful petition only prompts discussion on the subject concerned. There is absolutely no guarantee that the government will then
espouse the position expressed by the signatories.
(24-10-2011 10:13 )Tonywauk Wrote: [ -> ]As we can see with the current discussion on the country's future as a part of Europe a successful petition only prompts discussion on the subject concerned. There is absolutely no guarantee that the government will then
espouse the position expressed by the signatories.
the state the of current shows i couldnt give a fuck if they all folded ,they are nothing short of boring ,i have seen more titilation on jerry springer uncut!all this blame going ofcoms way i know they are out of date shitheads but the producers are as much to blame,how is it some nights can be classed as passable entertainment and another night is absolute shite?now thats not down to ofcom is it?rlc are quick enough to come on here and ask us not to post video"s of their shows but they cant be arsed to answer a single question regarding the petition and what their views are ,spineless ,they all are
I can see many more channels disappearing off the rador and the gloomy prediction is that it is heading all back to Square 1 with probably only Cellcast able to hold on to their channels and that'll be it, the Ofcom machine is rolling in thick and fast and no end is in sight. Who's to blame over this, I'd also say the spineless producers who only give a fuck about their bank balance and nothing else, they are not willing or going to fight Ofcom, it's all going to end in tears, how soon before RIP Threads start appearing all over the forums. The babe channels might very well finish before the astroid hits us next year to end the world and we can't even go out happy with a little bit of late night entertainment. Last night's show's for me looked like the begginning of the end such was the staleness of them I could smell the cobwebs.
(24-10-2011 16:48 )Scottishbloke Wrote: [ -> ]I can see many more channels disappearing off the rador and the gloomy prediction is that it is heading all back to Square 1 with probably only Cellcast able to hold on to their channels and that'll be it, the Ofcom machine is rolling in thick and fast and no end is in sight. Who's to blame over this, I'd also say the spineless producers who only give a fuck about their bank balance and nothing else, they are not willing or going to fight Ofcom, it's all going to end in tears, how soon before RIP Threads start appearing all over the forums. The babe channels might very well finish before the astroid hits us next year to end the world and we can't even go out happy with a little bit of late night entertainment. Last night's show's for me looked like the begginning of the end such was the staleness of them I could smell the cobwebs.
You and everyone else can do what they want ,i have been pursuing ofcoms sexist shit for 25 years..I am shitting weel sodding bloody sick of it..Women can tune in and see a penis but men cannot see female genatalia and that is SEXIST..It is also the channels fault because ofcom dont prewatch any show its up to the public to complain..So even if they did show vaginas if women complained they would be shot down by us males who have had to put up with it for 60 years...Channel 5 said ofcom say about feamale genatalia but they could go against IF THEY ARE NOT SEXIST but they dont so they are sexist..
Has anyone got a list of people who work at ofcom..I have some names..Fucking sexist cunts i would have no resentsment in smacking them in the head,,i would be in court and that would give even more coverage..Their must be at least 50% of the population males so why are you doing anything about this sexist act,unless your all bumboys.With or without this forum i have told ofcom i will fight this till i die but I SHOULD NOT HAVE TOO YOU FUCKING SEXIST CUNTS ..
just had a look and their only 323 signatures on the petition, i think this is a piss poor show by this forum,
i signed it on the first week it was up and this is the first time i have been back to see how it is doing and i was expecting it to be in the 1000's,
i find it hard to believe people can't find 5 min's to fill it in
(25-10-2011 11:33 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ]just had a look and their only 323 signatures on the petition, i think this is a piss poor show by this forum,
i signed it on the first week it was up and this is the first time i have been back to see how it is doing and i was expecting it to be in the 1000's,
i find it hard to believe people can't find 5 min's to fill it in
To restate: it won't be apathy in many cases. Many will've absorbed the aims behind the petition and will've decided not to sign, because they don't want to risk seeing the softcore routines they currently enjoy eventually being shoved out of the way by more explicit material that they wouldn't enjoy.
(20-10-2011 05:56 )hatesexistofcom Wrote: [ -> ]Another thing that keeps happening is people quoting rules..Rules like they cant touch their vagina with no knickers on or they cant show female genatalia because they could be turned on..Who says this,who says these rules,,,Ofcom. What about these rules,you cannot show a penis is the foreskin is pulled back,,you cant show a penis with both testicles in view..Do you see what i mean,ofcom put these rules into everyones head and even people on this forum quote them,,There are no rules it what ofcom has made up and told everyone and installed in their heads..If in the beggining ofcom said you cannot show both testicles in full view while the penis is in shot or the penis must not have the foreskin retracted more than 5% then these would be the rules...
I hope you understand what i am getting at..These rules are made up and made the female vagina taboo...What if in the beggining they made the male penis taboo..Its all in their heads and in yours and the countrys...Female genatalia is just that and male genatalia is just that the only difference is what ofcom make you and the british public believe..There is no reason why the above penis shots could not have been made up as rules its just ofcom are twats.Do you see what i mean ,all the quotes you lot are saying are made up by ofcom any rule can be made up..No woman is mastubating they just say that she could be scratching herself..
What if top gear was on and they showed vauxhall cars but pixellated out ford cars...When asked the presenters say its because ofcom said they cannot show ford cars...Do you see how childish it is, this debate is here because ofcom made up some rules and everyone in the UK just adheres to them and excepts that that is the norm whereas in the beggining it could have been the penis thats taboo on tv..If that happened then today all the women would be having this petition saying oh i cant bloody believe they show fannys but pixellate out penises its unfair and sexist.The thing is the females would be shouting from the rooftops and causing riots yet we have to put up with it..So thats my rant for today "THERE ARE NO RULES ONLY IN OFCOMS HEAD".
After I had read that, I realised that I had shouted every word with you. You have got passion and I like that. But the only way Ofcom will be put in their place is through the courts And not by any petition.