15-08-2011, 08:21
Hooking up is a lame thing to do you should have a good product in the first place and not just get away with having a rubbish product and thinking it's ok because a certain few special clients will ring in.
(15-08-2011 01:54 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ](15-08-2011 01:43 )SYBORG666 Wrote: [ -> ]The only problem is, we're talking about channels that are too shit scared to spend money to tackle the Ofcom issue. So, they won't have the balls to take a gamble and spend money to get a foreign license, whether they will increase their profit margin or not.
I actually think that the babeshows days are now numbered because their bending over and letting Ofcom royally shaft them.
Yeah, but if the women keep hooking up with their best callers, then it might not be the end of it
(15-08-2011 21:54 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]Having said that the authorities are probably not worried as long as channels behave themselves. Does Big L broadcast anything that would excite Ofcom? Incitement to riot? Too many ad breaks? Quack medicine? No? Difficult to motive the pen pushers to stop harassing babe channels.
As for hooking up with callers, it sounds fun and if there is genuine chemistry between a babe and a phone friend that is one thing, but the last thing a channel needs is to get a reputation as a knocking shop.
(14-09-2011 20:43 )Winston Wolfe Wrote: [ -> ](15-08-2011 01:54 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ](15-08-2011 01:43 )SYBORG666 Wrote: [ -> ]The only problem is, we're talking about channels that are too shit scared to spend money to tackle the Ofcom issue. So, they won't have the balls to take a gamble and spend money to get a foreign license, whether they will increase their profit margin or not.
I actually think that the babeshows days are now numbered because their bending over and letting Ofcom royally shaft them.
Yeah, but if the women keep hooking up with their best callers, then it might not be the end of it
(15-08-2011 21:54 )eccles Wrote: [ -> ]Having said that the authorities are probably not worried as long as channels behave themselves. Does Big L broadcast anything that would excite Ofcom? Incitement to riot? Too many ad breaks? Quack medicine? No? Difficult to motive the pen pushers to stop harassing babe channels.
As for hooking up with callers, it sounds fun and if there is genuine chemistry between a babe and a phone friend that is one thing, but the last thing a channel needs is to get a reputation as a knocking shop.
Remember how authorities work - if they can't get you one way, you can be sure they'll try and catch you another way...
In 2009, OFCOM really wanted to pull the plug on these channels. Legally, at the time, they were unable to do so.
Even though escorting is technically legal, if channels used the current format on TV as some kind of "secret shop window" for certain girls to escort on the side - then that would be illegal. It would go well beyond what they are licensed to provide. Make no mistake - if this became common knowledge, or some other proof came to the surface, then the plug really would get pulled on them.
This is one of the reasons why I've previously mentioned that any girls and channels publicly linked to escorting/prostitution should disassociate themselves from it. It brings negative attention.
(14-09-2011 21:26 )shankey! Wrote: [ -> ]i am pretty sure none of the girls would need to use the channels as a shop window if they are escorting ,there are many high class reputable agencies who would offer free discreet contacts as well a the girls regulars