The UK Babe Channels Forum

Taken things to a new level just now

Hi guys!!

Paige was on last night so therefore I think you can guess what is coming up now - yeah, that's right - a rant!!

I have been watching Paige's section on BSX from about 2305hrs but had to give up halfway through because the bloody producers decided that we would rather see graphics that one of the most popular girls on their shows and spoiling the experience for 99.99999999999999% of the viewers!!

Why the hell do they insist on doing this? Have they never actually heard the maxim 'LESS IS MORE!!'? If they have they quite clearly DON'T KNOW what it means!! If people were able to see more of the girls they will become more involved and actually phone the girls rather be subjected to oversized pointless graphics!! You don't see news bulletins festooned with this kind of thing so WTF should the babeshows be like that?

I like to watch Paige to help me calm down and forget about things but recently I have found myself spending more time screaming at the tv in frustration and raising my blood pressure (which is fragile as it is!!).

One final thing: has anyone here actually spoken to anyone on the shows about this? I doubt it because if you mentioned it to one of the girls you would get cut off for daring to question the experts!! I use the word 'expert' advisedly because recently it appears that they have been anything but!!

Finally Paige is on again tonight so you have been warned - another rant is HIGHLY LIKELY tomorrow!!

Rant away, I agree with you. The graphics annoy me so much i also find myself screaming at the tv, I can only wonder what the neighbours think, The worst part for me is when they bring up the half screen graphics and they keep them there reducing the space for the babe even more.

It seems to me the only way you're going to get to see a babe is if you buy their pictures.(That they constantly plug every 5 minutes)

(30-09-2010 20:15 )SimonAdams Wrote: [ -> ]Rant away, I agree with you. The graphics annoy me so much i also find myself screaming at the tv, I can only wonder what the neighbours think, The worst part for me is when they bring up the half screen graphics and they keep them there reducing the space for the babe even more.

It seems to me the only way you're going to get to see a babe is if you buy their pictures.(That they constantly plug every 5 minutes)

My neighbour must think the same - thankfully my tv is as far away from her house as it can get!!

I don't think the producers give a sh*t about the TV viewers and callers. I reckon they've worked out they get more cash from those phoning in who watch on the webstream (where I think there are less graphics?).

So ironically, although BS is supposed to be a set of TV Shows, they are possibly more interested in the internet webstream customers rather than us TV viewers/callers.

However, this doesn't make it any less annoying - why can't they try to please both groups of viewers and callers??

(30-09-2010 20:28 )stueyboy Wrote: [ -> ]I don't think the producers give a sh*t about the TV viewers and callers. I reckon they've worked out they get more cash from those phoning in who watch on the webstream

In that case why have Partyland or BSx

When it is only BS1 that is on the webstream at the moment.


Cellcast/Babestation have been told that having all 3 on webstreams would bring in more viewers/callers but still they have only 1

(30-09-2010 20:28 )stueyboy Wrote: [ -> ]why can't they try to please both groups of viewers and callers??

Because they are not interested in viewers. They are only interested in those of us who call, or buy pictures-that is how they make their money. Of course I prefer to be able to see the girl who I am chatting to though.

(01-10-2010 08:26 )bytor Wrote: [ -> ]

(30-09-2010 20:28 )stueyboy Wrote: [ -> ]why can't they try to please both groups of viewers and callers??

Because they are not interested in viewers. They are only interested in those of us who call, or buy pictures-that is how they make their money. Of course I prefer to be able to see the girl who I am chatting to though.

They would be interested in viewers if one of the callers DEMANDED that they could see the whole babe onscreen not just a face, one boob or butt cheek or a leg!!

I think some of the graphics are good, when the information box was covering Paige's face, I wouldn't know who it was unless it had Paige's name in the top left hand corner.

If you cannot tell, I am making a joke about how stupid and annoying the on screen graphics are!!!

(01-10-2010 08:36 )Ally4Paige Wrote: [ -> ]

(01-10-2010 08:26 )bytor Wrote: [ -> ]

(30-09-2010 20:28 )stueyboy Wrote: [ -> ]why can't they try to please both groups of viewers and callers??

Because they are not interested in viewers. They are only interested in those of us who call, or buy pictures-that is how they make their money. Of course I prefer to be able to see the girl who I am chatting to though.

They would be interested in viewers if one of the callers DEMANDED that they could see the whole babe onscreen not just a face, one boob or butt cheek or a leg!!

Demand anything and you'll probably end up being disconnected, Cause thats how they roll.