15-09-2019, 10:38
It's a shame that Jamie feels she can't read the comments but I understand the cammers complaints. They are are asking people to pay £3 per minute for something that is often substandard so you can understand the frustration. The webcams they use are pretty useless in low light and they don't seem to have the bandwidth to cope when a lot of people are on there. They could solve the lighting issue easily by lighting the sets better for cams. If they want to use dark lighting fine, then unplug the cam and get the girl to perform to the TV audience or invest in better high res cams.
Certainly no need to have a go at the girls though, It's not their fault, it's the gallery staff and IT department. In fact the girls suffer, as people won't use the cams as much if the quality is poor and they will lose income.
Certainly no need to have a go at the girls though, It's not their fault, it's the gallery staff and IT department. In fact the girls suffer, as people won't use the cams as much if the quality is poor and they will lose income.