I think theres more to this. I've seen Ashley Emmas show her buttocks loads of times... I think maybe they are only allowed to do it after a certain time? Maybe 22.05 was too early
(24-04-2017 22:39 )Lamarr l 21 l Wrote: [ -> ]I think theres more to this. I've seen Ashley Emmas show her buttocks loads of times... I think maybe they are only allowed to do it after a certain time
Having now read the actual judgement in the Ofcom letter, it is to do with it being a "prolonged close up". It is all tied up with the visual aspect of babeshows being deemed "advertising" content, not editorial. It is "advertising" the call/chat service.
Advertising is subject to far stricter rules.
Not sure why the babeshows cannot get their status reassigned to "editorial"? Cost?
It is all a load of utter bollox, if you read it. Have Ofcom not got more important things to do?
(24-04-2017 22:45 )Rake Wrote: [ -> ] (24-04-2017 22:39 )Lamarr l 21 l Wrote: [ -> ]I think theres more to this. I've seen Ashley Emmas show her buttocks loads of times... I think maybe they are only allowed to do it after a certain time
Having now read the actual judgement in the Ofcom letter, it is to do with it being a "prolonged close up". It is all tied up with the visual aspect of babeshows being deemed "advertising" content, not editorial. It is "advertising" the call/chat service.
Advertising is subject to far stricter rules.
Not sure why the babeshows cannot get their status reassigned to "editorial"? Cost?
It is all a load of utter bollox, if you read it. Have Ofcom not got more important things to do?
Guess not! They should learn how to wank or get a life! Fuck ofCom,dicks .It's a fuckin adult show in the adult sextion.Cunt bags!
I think it's just a case of them flexing their muscles every so often, reminding the channels they still exist and helping to reassure the
jealous women offended people
they are still active on their behalf.
There's no mention of fines in there. So just a telling off?
^ Hopefully just a slap on the ass, nothing more.
ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ
Pretty crappy night.
Nearly 3am, nobody nude, topless only B.S. Caty being so tame it's almost pointless to have her on nights, and the other two stuck together in predictability.
(24-04-2017 22:45 )Rake Wrote: [ -> ]Not sure why the babeshows cannot get their status reassigned to "editorial"? Cost?
Cost is irrelevant. Even if you had unlimited funds I doubt that you could win a court action against Ofcom.
Is Mary Whitehouse still exerting her influence on OFCOM from beyond the grave>
(25-04-2017 02:46 )mrmann Wrote: [ -> ]Nearly 3am, nobody nude, topless only B.S. Caty being so tame it's almost pointless to have her on nights, and the other two stuck together in predictability.
I thought "some miseries are going to go 'boo, Caty won't get naked, what a load of rubbish'" Oh well, your loss