(01-07-2015 23:21 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]Obviously, I kincludedow why people don’t like her, but why watch her, then? It's as though they secretly enjoy hating her...
And, in all honesty, there aren't many babes around these days that put on a much of a performance, anyway, so, some of us just enjoy a babe (as much as we can) that we actually find attractive; even though we would love to see the Ella of old, it ain’t going to happen.
Oh, and though I don't like DOM, I do like the outfit, so there!
The reason why this subject pushes the buttons with certain posters (myself Included) is that we resent what Ella (and Lucy-Anne) stand for on these night time shows. (Although, personally, I often watch Lucy-Anne's teases on fast-forward; she's not the surest at always knowing what she's showing! ) It is not really about them or their looks, or their abilities on the phones. It is about what they represent.
These performers represent the changes in attitude and performance that have afflicted the channels in recent years. Changes way beyond what is required by current regulations. We can rationalise the reasons for these changes but find difficulty in finding humour in a situation that is a constant reminder of what we are missing out on now.
This is something the performers themselves often fail to grasp I feel. Their egos always tell them it must be personal and we get the vitriolic reactions on social media as a result.
If you people are unlucky enough to watch her show at length probably to see if she goes mad at 4am and get oiled up and naked...well I did.
(02-07-2015 11:29 )ShandyHand Wrote: [ -> ] (01-07-2015 23:21 )Censorship :-( Wrote: [ -> ]Obviously, I kincludedow why people don’t like her, but why watch her, then? It's as though they secretly enjoy hating her...
And, in all honesty, there aren't many babes around these days that put on a much of a performance, anyway, so, some of us just enjoy a babe (as much as we can) that we actually find attractive; even though we would love to see the Ella of old, it ain’t going to happen.
Oh, and though I don't like DOM, I do like the outfit, so there!
The reason why this subject pushes the buttons with certain posters (myself Included) is that we resent what Ella (and Lucy-Anne) stand for on these night time shows. (Although, personally, I often watch Lucy-Anne's teases on fast-forward; she's not the surest at always knowing what she's showing! ) It is not really about them or their looks, or their abilities on the phones. It is about what they represent.
These performers represent the changes in attitude and performance that have afflicted the channels in recent years. Changes way beyond what is required by current regulations. We can rationalise the reasons for these changes but find difficulty in finding humour in a situation that is a constant reminder of what we are missing out on now.
This is something the performers themselves often fail to grasp I feel. Their egos always tell them it must be personal and we get the vitriolic reactions on social media as a result.
I don't disagree with much of what you have written, but there are so many babes who don't put on a performance these days, and Ella's hardly the reason for why performances have become so poor from the majority (at least, as far as I know - then again, maybe she's employed by Ofcon ?
)
I also understand why some may like her aesthetically (as I do), and therefore are more frustrated that she doesn’t perform (unlike the 'good old days', when she was a great performer, IMO), but, If I don't like a babe, for whatever reason (and truth be told, the vast majority hold little interest for me), I simply don't watch them
. It just seems strange that people feel the need to waste their time and energy attacking the same babe, for the same reasons.
But, hey, it's their choice, and it's a free world (allegedly!
).
As for her getting screen time alone (another common complaint directed at her), that's the decision of the broadcaster, not her fault (I'm assuming), so blame them, not her. And, for the record, she has suffered from sardine canning too.
^Louise Porter was not inactive on the babeshows before she joined sintv, Louise started on the babeshows in may 2009 on the bs/cellcast channel party land so will have had a shining resume to hand to s66 if she ever decided to join them. same applies to ree petra, she's been active on the babeshows for about 8yrs. a lot of the sin roster have lots of years experience on the babeshows. s66 aren't bothered about how a babe performed on other channels. they are just bothered about whether she will bring in the calls for them. if they think she will bring in the calls etc, then they will sign her
as for ella jolie, s66 have brought her back because she makes them money, simple as that. agree with censorship, ella is not to blame for how performances are from babes on the shows these days and neither is she to blame for other things like solo screentime. that's all either down to the other babes themselves or the producers etc behind the scenes. im the same with babes I don't like too, if I don't like a babe (ella is one of those babes) then I just simply don't waste any time or energy posting about her
(02-07-2015 13:21 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]im the same with babes I don't like too, if I don't like a babe (ella is one of those babes) then I just simply don't waste any time or energy posting about her
Just like the energy spent on Lori, Geri & the usual suspects on BS?
Never agreed with your serial criticism of them, but respected your right make them. Why can't any criticism be accepted now? Because it's about a more favoured babe or station.
Not actually picking on you Rammy but using your quote as others voice the same old cliche of don't like don't watch don't comment when their favourites are criticised but don't hold back on other babes or channels. And they can as far as I'm concerned, it's a forum not fan zone.
I hope amy gets some solo time tonight, she always puts in a good performance, schedule looks favourable to it aswell.
What is she like on the phones? any good?
(02-07-2015 14:18 )KerrAvon Wrote: [ -> ] (02-07-2015 13:21 )Rammyrascal Wrote: [ -> ]im the same with babes I don't like too, if I don't like a babe (ella is one of those babes) then I just simply don't waste any time or energy posting about her
Just like the energy spent on Lori, Geri & the usual suspects on BS?
Never agreed with your serial criticism of them, but respected your right make them. Why can't any criticism be accepted now? Because it's about a more favoured babe or station.
Not actually picking on you Rammy but using your quote as others voice the same old cliche of don't like don't watch don't comment when their favourites are criticised but don't hold back on other babes or channels. And they can as far as I'm concerned, it's a forum not fan zone.
I never said people can't criticise, just saying I don't waste time or energy watching or posting about babeshow babes I don't like. If people want to watch babes they don't like then that's up to them. As censorship says it is strange that forum members watch babes they don't like & then post about them
Paige Turnah is on the schedule for next Monday night.