I think it's chalk and cheese.
I think that the studio sound is something within the capabilities of the studio to resolve to our satisfaction whereas the quality of picture isn't.
Although I have to admit that there appear to be very few readers who agree with me.
You would have thought there was enough in the babe's or St66's kitties to kit themselves out with decent cams at home though...sometimes the picture quaklty makes it look like they are using equipment that's over 10 years old...
That's what most readers have written but given what I've seen and what Gallery has written I contend that the problem concerns the quality of the UK's internet and that we'll have to wait for the Government or Starlink to fix that.
just noticed their updated former girls list on the site as well as all traces of (i'll go with initials just incase) P G have gone from here.... when did that happen?
(19-06-2020 11:13 )lovebabes56 Wrote: [ -> ]You would have thought there was enough in the babe's or St66's kitties to kit themselves out with decent cams at home though...sometimes the picture quaklty makes it look like they are using equipment that's over 10 years old...
or it might be the equipment at S66?
Like tumble weed this morning on the channel
(20-06-2020 02:25 )Rokk38 Wrote: [ -> ]just noticed their updated former girls list on the site as well as all traces of (i'll go with initials just incase) P G have gone from here.... when did that happen?
I thought she hadn't been on for a while
^^ What you on about, best lineup in years
one question i would ask S66 is what do you do for the 70% cut for girls using there services
Anyone see Emma C's tweet last night she had been cam for 30 mins and realised that she was not showing up on the site
seems to me the girls are getting shoddy service for what S66 takes they really are the virgin media of babeshows