03-06-2017, 19:49
^^ Could be... It'd be hard to say more than that unless dirt is dished by those involved. It would be damn surprising to me though if DBS had failed to cause at least some discontent amongst the babes in the past. When all's said and done, there is quite a bit of self-interest in each babe getting good slots, obviously, and as a crowd these women are not exactly known for being self-affacing are they! Someone has to have been put out by this before?
On a related note...
If, as seems highly likely, the concensus on here is correct in suggesting that some babes have solo set exclusive contracts at 66 nights, this has a couple intrinsic problems associated with it too. One, anything that sets one level of 'staff' above another is ripe for causing resentments.
And two, there are only so many babes one operator has the scheduling space to grant a solo exclusivity honour to. Once such a thing became known in the industry, any potential incoming babe of note, would, if she has anything about her, request the same benefit in her contract. When full compliment of solo-onlys was reached, turning a babe down on this element could well become a question of seeming to not acknowledge her status - putting her recruitment at risk.
In other words, a concession granted in order to gain a signature or two in the past might well have become an issue in gaining further top class players by now. Considering the largely incestous recruiting policies of these channels, I often wonder whether this chicken has come home to roost for 66 as yet.
On a related note...
If, as seems highly likely, the concensus on here is correct in suggesting that some babes have solo set exclusive contracts at 66 nights, this has a couple intrinsic problems associated with it too. One, anything that sets one level of 'staff' above another is ripe for causing resentments.
And two, there are only so many babes one operator has the scheduling space to grant a solo exclusivity honour to. Once such a thing became known in the industry, any potential incoming babe of note, would, if she has anything about her, request the same benefit in her contract. When full compliment of solo-onlys was reached, turning a babe down on this element could well become a question of seeming to not acknowledge her status - putting her recruitment at risk.
In other words, a concession granted in order to gain a signature or two in the past might well have become an issue in gaining further top class players by now. Considering the largely incestous recruiting policies of these channels, I often wonder whether this chicken has come home to roost for 66 as yet.