(13-11-2019 23:32 )tigeralf Wrote: [ -> ]How do S66tv expect to keep viewers when the picture quality of Eve & Alexa's shows are piss poor and that's putting it mildly
Eve's feed was not too bad while I was watching - relatively early on mind you - I did have to give up on my #1 though as the feed was non - existant! I take it, it got much worse thereafter?? I really do not know what the management think is working so well on S66 anymore (daytime apart - which is quality) that they persist with this pap!! Was the company taken over from original owners does anybody know?? Seems like they might be on a youth training scheme, if that is the case!! Can't understand how the girls put up with it??
It looks like a new company has taken over as Jamie seems to not do much with it anymore.
Given my experience in several companies I would suggest that as a result of personnel changes we may notice that S66's output will appear turbulent for some time
How long? Well my company was bought six years ago but it still can't achieve what was routinely accomplished beforehand.
I don't subscribe to the view that it'll go under by Christmas etc.
I think that it is difficult to judge. I read one critical post and then another that's full of praise.
^^ I don't know when those are updated to but in last few months he's sold off most his shares to one of the other owners he deffenalty not in charge of the company any more,
Also I am told he's had very little to do with the day to day running for a few years so it's hardly a new thing him not being involved
(14-11-2019 15:25 )hornball Wrote: [ -> ]had to abandon 'my woman -Alexa' as the connection was so bad! I don't imagine many callers will be to happy if the majority of their time is taken up looking at a frozen screen - however good the 'communicating experience'.
You need to look at the bigger picture though, as they are not using firestorm media for them so they don't have to give them a cut of every penny the shows make, so if they can get it right then could be a good money maker for them,
^
I can't find any information, that Jamie in the last few months has sold more of his shares .
The last companies house record for 965 TV limited show Jamie as owning 75% or more of the shares, he is also shown as the only director
https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/compa...nt-control
I might be wrong on this, but i assume that companies house would have to be notified about any change in share ownership or any change in directors etc, and within a month or so this information would be updated and be available to the public to view ?
PS, i am not a expert in any shape or form concerning these matters, i just post what i see in the official records.
^^ really appreciate your info mate, you know way more than me about it, i was told he only has about 25% ownership now, dont know if he could still be named if he dont own very much, someone on her must know
(14-11-2019 16:29 )winsaw Wrote: [ -> ] (14-11-2019 15:25 )hornball Wrote: [ -> ]had to abandon 'my woman -Alexa' as the connection was so bad! I don't imagine many callers will be to happy if the majority of their time is taken up looking at a frozen screen - however good the 'communicating experience'.
You need to look at the bigger picture though, as they are not using firestorm media for them so they don't have to give them a cut of every penny the shows make, so if they can get it right then could be a good money maker for them,
I am guessing you are referring to the girls not having to give a cut of earnings, rather than the company not having to properly reward the girls?? I might understand that, but it still doesn't lessen the need for a certain standard - for the reasons I stated....right??